Closed anirudh4792 closed 5 years ago
shnizzedy
commented
6 years ago If we want to do anything moving the documents to spreadsheet(s) (I'm not convinced that we need to yet), I'd suggest making a new workbook for it.
That being said, what besides the rating scale would we be adding at this point? If nothing, I vote for keeping it in a text doc for now.
anirudh4792
commented
6 years ago That being said, what besides the rating scale would we be adding at this point? besides the rating scale, it would be the criteria you used for your wearables paper (eg location, size etc.)
Why I feel it needs to be exported is because I shall be seeding the database further, and I would have to fill in the rating scales and wearable criteria anyway for future entries.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Jon Clucas notifications@github.com wrote:
If we want to do anything moving the documents to spreadsheet(s) (I'm not convinced that we need to yet), I'd suggest making a new workbook for it.
That being said, what besides the rating scale would we be adding at this point? If nothing, I vote for keeping it in a text doc for now.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ChildMindInstitute/mhdb/issues/59#issuecomment-351753876, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKCstQ84dtbHpMGZVJa2dB7b6GchiTZ6ks5tAUaJgaJpZM4RBX8j .
shnizzedy
commented
6 years ago Oh, I totally forgot to send you the criteria we used for that evaluation. A lot of these may not be applicable. Here they are:
anirudh4792
commented
6 years ago Thanks.
Moisture and pulsewave sensors have been added under sensors.
battery life, download time, weight, water resistance, sizes can be added under specs that the developer would fill.
Comfort seems a nice option to include under SubjectiveUserExperience.
The rest have been accounted for.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Jon Clucas notifications@github.com wrote:
Oh, I totally forgot to send you the criteria we used for that evaluation. A lot of these may not be applicable. Here they are:
- Activity sensors
- Accelerometer range
- Accelerometer resolution
- Gyroscope
- Magnetometer
- Altimeter
- GPS
- Inertial movement unit
- Physiology sensors
- Photoplethysmograph
- Electrodermal
- Thermopile
- Moisture sensor
- Light sensor
- Pulsewave sensor
- Inferential measures
- Active minutes
- Sleep duration
- Sleep quality
- Sleep stages
- Skin temperature?
- Heart rate
- Heart rate variability
- Practical issues
- Raw data
- (Reported) Battery life
- Water resistance
- Child-size form factor?
- Weight
- Fashion statement
- Price
- Additional notes
- Data collection
- Other sensors
- Concerns
- Additional selling points
- Experience
- Comfort
- Battery life
- Indicator clarity
- Software interface
- Download time
- Recommended use
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ChildMindInstitute/mhdb/issues/59#issuecomment-351803636, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKCstfaTUPAQv1LvkBoliHhNsiPWdiEIks5tAW-pgaJpZM4RBX8j .
binarybottle
commented
6 years ago If they have all been accounted for, shouldn't this issue be closed? I would also make the title more descriptive, like "Include rating criteria from the actigraphy wearable device study" and provide a link to the biorxiv article in this issue.
binarybottle
commented
5 years ago I think that we'll be revisiting rating scales in a later (rdf) incarnation of this database, so closing.
Do you think it would be a good idea to get all the categories from the google doc and add it as categories (columns) in our spreadsheet for the projects (apps, wearables etc.)? https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qamznEEkbyAfDfdy1ha_L_CDlArUU5ex5aO1TCOjzM/edit
Once we decide on rating scales, I could add the evaluation as a column index with the category in the main sheet with the options themselves being categories. (eg. SubjectiveUserExperience_index with 1-poor, 5-great etc.)