ChilianSlovak / AriaofHonolulu

Reviews of plant biology as well as plant-people relationship studies
0 stars 0 forks source link

Environmental Factors Affecting Monoterpene Emissions from Terrestrial Vegetation #41

Open ChilianSlovak opened 1 year ago

ChilianSlovak commented 1 year ago

Journal: Plants Authors: Malik et al

Introduction All terrestrial plants emit biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), relatively small chain hydrocarbon compounds that have lower boiling points and evaporate easily. These compounds play an important role in atmospheric chemistry [1], plant physiology [2], plant defense and competition [3,4,5,6], and communication between plants and other organisms [7,8,9]. Monoterpenes are the second most dominant group of BVOCs after isoprene, with an estimated global annual emission rate of 107.5 Tg C yr−1 contributing ~12% to the global BVOC budget [10]. Monoterpenes are generally derived from the condensation of two isoprene (C5H8) units and include a variety of well-known compounds including pinene, linalool, and limonene among others [11]. Biosynthesis of monoterpenes is catalyzed by monoterpene synthases (cyclases), which convert the universal precursor geranyl diphosphate (GDP) to the parent structures of the various monoterpene groups. De novo synthesis is light-dependent and can occur in the cytosol through the mevalonic pathway (MEV) or in the chloroplast, through the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway [11,12]. Different plant species will have different enzymes leading to the formation of specific monoterpenes (monoterpene synthases), leading to a huge diversity of these plant natural products across the plant kingdom [11,12]. For instance, α-pinene and β-pinene make up most monoterpene emissions from oaks and conifers [13,14,15,16], while E-β-ocimene is commonly released by plants of the Salicaceae family [17,18,19]. Although a wide spectrum of monoterpenes is emitted by tree species [2,20], considerable emissions of some compounds (e.g., α-pinene and β-pinene, Δ3-carene, limonene, etc.) are also reported from Poaceae species as well as from rice, maize, bamboo, and other grasses [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Besides the emission of monoterpenes from the tree and grass species, over the last two decades there has been increasing work investigating monoterpene emissions in other crops [27,28], and horticultural species [29,30,31,32,33,34], as well as ornamental plants and invasive alien species [27,28,35,36]. The emission of BVOCs varies in time and intensity in response to abiotic factors such as temperature, light intensity, CO2, O3,and O2 concentrations, but the exact mechanisms behind these responses are not yet fully understood [19,37]. However, monoterpene emissions have been reported to have distinct dependencies on light and temperature compared to those reported for other BVOCs. This is attributed to the ability of some plants to store them and their high solubility in water (such as linalool) [38,39,40]. Terpenes can be produced de novo and released immediately or stored in non-specific internal pools or specialized endogenous and exogenous structures such as resin secretory structures and glandular trichomes [41,42,43]. The emissions of stored monoterpenes are mainly temperature dependent, while the non-stored monoterpenes are believed to be dependent on both temperature and light [41]. Moreover, the stored monoterpene emissions are also influenced by other factors such as humidity, diffusion resistance, cell wall, membrane thickness, and pool storage size [43,44,45,46]. In the next sections, we provide an overview of the abiotic environmental factors affecting monoterpene emissions, including putative mechanisms, and identify knowledge gaps to be addressed by future research.

References

  1. Holzinger, R.; Lee, A.; Paw, K.T.; Goldstein, U.A.H. Observations of oxidation products above a forest imply biogenic emissions of very reactive compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2005, 5, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kesselmeier, J.; Staudt, M. Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC): An overview on emission, physiology and ecology. J. Atmos. Chem. 1999, 33, 23–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McCormick, A.C.; Unsicker, S.B.; Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Effah, E.; Holopainen, J.K.; McCormick, A.C. Potential roles of volatile organic compounds in plant competition. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2019, 38, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kegge, W.; Pierik, R. Biogenic volatile organic compounds and plant competition. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Clavijo McCormick, A.; Effah, E.; Najar-Rodriguez, A. Ecological aspects of volatile organic compounds emitted by exotic invasive plants. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 1059125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dorman, H.J.D.; Deans, S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baldwin, I.T.; Halitschke, R.; Paschold, A.; Von Dahl, C.C.; Preston, C.A. Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: “talking trees” in the genomics era. Science 2006, 311, 812–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Beyaert, I.; Hilker, M. Plant odour plumes as mediators of plant-insect interactions. Biol. Rev. 2014, 89, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Messina, P.; Lathière, J.; Sindelarova, K.; Vuichard, N.; Granier, C.; Ghattas, J.; Cozic, A.; Hauglustaine, D.A. Global biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the ORCHIDEE and MEGAN models and sensitivity to key parameters. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 14169–14202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Banthorpe, D.V.; Charlwood, B.V.; Francis, M.J. Biosynthesis of monoterpenes. Chem. Rev. 1972, 72, 115–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mahmoud, S.S.; Croteau, R.B. Strategies for transgenic manipulation of monoterpene biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pio, C.A.; Valente, A.A. Atmospheric fluxes and concentrations of monoterpenes in resin-tapped pine forests. Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Christensen, C.S.; Hummelshøj, P.; Jensen, N.O.; Larsen, B.; Lohse, C.; Pilegaard, K.; Skov, H. Determination of the terpene flux from orange species and Norway spruce by relaxed eddy accumulation. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 3057–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rinne, J.; Bäck, J.; Hakola, H. Biogenic volatile organic compound emissions from the Eurasian taiga: Current knowledge and future directions. Boreal Environ. Res. 2009, 14, 807–826. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jardine, K.J.; Zorzanelli, R.F.; Gimenez, B.O.; de Oliveira Piva, L.R.; Teixeira, A.; Fontes, C.G.; Robles, E.; Higuchi, N.; Chambers, J.Q.; Martin, S.T. Leaf isoprene and monoterpene emission distribution across hyperdominant tree genera in the Amazon basin. Phytochemistry 2020, 175, 112366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. McCormick, A.C.; Irmisch, S.; Reinecke, A.; Boeckler, G.A.; Veit, D.; Reichelt, M.; Hansson, B.S.; Gershenzon, J.; Köllner, T.G.; Unsicker, S.B. Herbivore-induced volatile emission in black poplar: Regulation and role in attracting herbivore enemies. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1909–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tun, K.M.; Minor, M.; Jones, T.; McCormick, A.C. Volatile profiling of fifteen willow species and hybrids and their responses to giant willow aphid infestation. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schnitzler, J.P.; Louis, S.; Behnke, K.; Loivamäki, M. Poplar volatiles–biosynthesis, regulation and (eco) physiology of isoprene and stress-induced isoprenoids. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 302–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fiore, A.M.; Naik, V.; Spracklen, D.V.; Steiner, A.; Unger, N.; Prather, M.; Bergmann, D.; Cameron-Smith, P.J.; Cionni, I.; Collins, W.J.; et al. Global air quality and climate. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6663–6683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kirstine, W.; Galbally, I.; Ye, Y.; Hooper, M. Emissions of volatile organic compounds (primarily oxygenated species) from pasture. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1998, 103, 10605–10619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fukui, Y.; Doskey, P.V. Identification of non-methane organic compound emissions from grassland vegetation. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 2947–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wondwosen, B.; Birgersson, G.; Seyoum, E.; Tekie, H.; Torto, B.; Fillinger, U.; Hill, S.R.; Ignell, R. Rice volatiles lure gravid malaria mosquitoes, Anopheles arabiensis. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 37930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wondwosen, B.; Hill, S.R.; Birgersson, G.; Seyoum, E.; Tekie, H.; Ignell, R. A (maize)ing attraction: Gravid Anopheles arabiensis are attracted and oviposit in response to maize pollen odours. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. He, Y.; Yue, Y.; Tang, F.; Guo, X.; Wang, J. Chemical compositions and antioxidant capacity of essential oils from different species of the bamboo leaves. Sci Silvae Sin. 2010, 46, 120–128. [Google Scholar]
  26. Asmare, Y.; Hill, S.R.; Hopkins, R.J.; Tekie, H.; Ignell, R. The role of grass volatiles on oviposition site selection by Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles coluzzii. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Effah, E.; Barrett, D.P.; Peterson, P.G.; Godfrey, A.J.R.; Potter, M.A.; Holopainen, J.K.; Clavijo McCormick, A. Natural variation in volatile emissions of the invasive weed Calluna vulgaris in New Zealand. Plants 2020, 9, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Effah, E.; Barrett, D.P.; Peterson, P.G.; Wargent, J.J.; Potter, M.A.; Holopainen, J.K.; Clavijo McCormick, A. Herbivory and attenuated UV radiation affect volatile emissions of the invasive weed Calluna vulgaris. Molecules 2020, 25, 3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karl, T.; Guenther, A.; Turnipseed, A.; Tyndall, G.; Artaxo, P.; Martin, S. Rapid formation of isoprene photo-oxidation products observed in Amazonia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 7753–7767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ruuskanen, T.M.; Müller, M.; Schnitzhofer, R.; Karl, T.; Graus, M.; Bamberger, I.; Hörtnagl, F.; Brilli, G.; Wohlfahrt, G.; Hansel, A. Eddy covariance VOC emission and deposition fluxes above grassland using PTR-TOF. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 611–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Graus, M.; Eller, A.S.; Fall, R.; Yuan, B.; Qian, Y.; Westra, P.; de Gouw, J.; Warneke, C. Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of volatile organic compounds over C4 biofuel crops. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 66, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mozaffar, A. Exchanges of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds between the Atmosphere and Agricultural Plants/Ecosystems in Controlled and Field Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. Effah, E.; Tun, K.M.; Rangiwananga, N.; McCormick, A.C. Mānuka clones differ in their volatile profiles: Potential implications for plant defence, pollinator attraction and bee products. Agronomy 2022, 12, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumeroa, F.; Komahan, S.; Sofkova-Bobcheva, S.; Clavijo McCormick, A. Characterization of the volatile profiles of six industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Noe, S.M.; Penuelas, J.; Niinemets, U. Monoterpene emissions from ornamental trees in urban areas: A case study of Barcelona, Spain. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Llusia, J.; Penuelas, J.; Sardans, J.; Owen, S.M.; Niinemets, U. Measurement of volatile terpene emissions in 70 dominant vascular plant species in Hawaii: Aliens emit more than natives. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2010, 19, 863–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Scheffer, J.J. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: Volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Loreto, F.; Schnitzler, J.P. Abiotic stresses and induced BVOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Malik, T.G.; Gajbhiye, T.; Pandey, S.K. Some insights into composition and monoterpene emission rates from selected dominant tropical tree species of Central India: Plant-specific seasonal variations. Ecol. Res. 2019, 34, 821–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feng, Z.; Yuan, X.; Fares, S.; Loreto, F.; Li, P.; Hoshika, Y.; Paoletti, E. Isoprene is more affected by climate drivers than monoterpenes: A meta-analytic review on plant isoprenoid emissions. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 1939–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nagalingam, S.; Seco, R.; Kim, S.; Guenther, A. Heat stress strongly induces monoterpene emissions in some plants with specialized terpenoid storage structures. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 333, 109400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Niinemets, Ü.; Loreto, F.; Reichstein, M. Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Niinemets, Ü.; Reichstein, M. A model analysis of the effects of nonspecific monoterpenoid storage in leaf tissues on emission kinetics and composition in Mediterranean sclerophyllous Quercus species. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2002, 16, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dindorf, T.; Kuhn, U.; Ganzeveld, L.; Schebeske, G.; Ciccioli, P.; Holzke, C.; Koble, R.; Seufert, G.; Kesselmeier, J. Significant light and temperature dependent monoterpene emissions from European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and their potential impact on the European volatile organic compound budget. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2006, 111, D16305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kuhn, U.; Rottenberger, S.; Biesenthal, T.; Wolf, A.; Schebeske, G.; Ciccioli, P.; Kesselmeier, J. Strong correlation between isoprene emission and gross photosynthetic capacity during leaf phenology of the tropical tree species Hymenaea courbaril with fundamental changes in volatile organic compounds emission composition during early leaf development. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 1469–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ormeno, E.; Mévy, J.P.; Vila, B.; Bousquet-Mélou, A.; Greff, S.; Bonin, G.; Fernandez, C. Water deficit stress induces different monoterpene and sesquiterpene emission changes in Mediterranean species. Relationship between terpene emissions and plant water potential. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]