Open cli00004 opened 1 year ago
I just ran across this today, and the overall issue I believe is not supporting Apollo Federation 2.0.
I wrote my own interfaceObject directive, and it was output in the schema, but then rover refused to merge the graphs because the one from HotChocolate didn't have a @link directive specifying it was using v2.0
@darren-clark , Also we need the entity resolver to be able to resolve on the interface type which i don't think it's supported atm
It isn't. I fiddled a bit today to see if I could get something working with manually created schema for federation. Specifically trying to get an entity resolve for an interface to work.
I was able to get it to call a resolver for a base class.
However even though the resolver returned a derived class, the response from HotChocolate was empty.
Probably because the query was ... on BaseInterface { __typename field }
and the resolver returned DerivedImplementation
so they got removed.
Product
Hot Chocolate
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Apollo Federation has introduced @interfaceObject which isn't supported in HotChocolate.ApolloFederation package. This is an import feature that not only reduces code duplication in subgraphs, but also help us provide capability to resolve a external interface reference in a polymorphic manner
The solution you'd like
Please add support for @interfaceObject and support resolving interface object type in subgraphs