Closed ruineka closed 1 year ago
What does this have to do with remote deployments? it looks like a change to enable local deployment.
If the file is in an sshfs
mount that would just be incidental?
What does this have to do with remote deployments? it looks like a change to enable local deployment. If the file is in an
sshfs
mount that would just be incidental?
The intended purpose is to mount a remote directory with something like sshfs and give it a remote location as the path to be deployed.
You could also give a path to an image on the local drive of the system but that would't make much sense.
I don't quite understand the remote deploy use case, but the local one makes sense to me.
Tested using
sshfs
and in theory ftp or any other mountable shares should work as well.frzr-deploy /path/to/remote/.img.tar.xz