Open ChocoRagdoll opened 4 months ago
Hi, thanks for your feedback. We have included “Errors Improvement” in our planned enhancements, which mentions this exact error and our plans for improving the consistency of errors. When we execute the planned enhancements, this issue would be resolved.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
When a very large positive integer is entered as the index, the app shows a different error message from the supposed 'the person index provided is invalid'. Since it is rather a rare case for a user to input such a large number, this bug should not be so severe. However, since this happens for every command that includes index, I will tag this as medium.