Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
I've also fallen foul of this. I have lots of Spring XML files with class
string
literals. The packages have been renamed by jarjar but not these config files. I
would suggest this is a fairly high priority request?
Original comment by craftedb...@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2009 at 5:07
I'm voting for it.
My use case is that I'd like to have java source files also string-replaced
based on
the rule. This way sources correspond to compiled classes and IDEs don't have
problems with browsing source code / javadocs.
Original comment by szcze...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 12:00
Another good one is JAR files that implement Sun's Service Provider mechanism.
It used
to be a sun.misc. API, but now it's been officially standardized into
java.util.ServiceLoader in Java 6 and beyond. These JAR files have textual
references
to FQCNs in the META-INF directory tree.
Original comment by van...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 2:17
Not much happening with this issue. Do maintainers want one of us to take a
stab at
the source code and contribute a patch?
Original comment by szcze...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 2:43
I've done a basic implementation of this feature here:
https://github.com/szczepiq/jarjar/commits/master
Feel free to pull :)
Original comment by szcze...@gradle.biz
on 11 Sep 2012 at 1:50
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
van...@gmail.com
on 8 Dec 2008 at 8:04