Closed jgeerds closed 7 years ago
It appears that GPLv3 is incompatible with GPLv2; since we're using yi-rope (which is GPLv2) should we be using GPLv2 for Rasa?
@ChrisPenner yi-rope could probably upgrade the license to GPLv2 or later
if that's a concern.
Doesnt rasa only use it as a library? so licence is no issue.
@robinvd Since we use the library; Rasa is considered a combined work; and therefore must be compatible with the lib.
See here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#IfLibraryIsGPL
Let's wait and see if yi-rope switches to GPLv3
@ChrisPenner huh did not know that, thanks for the link
I just realized GPLv2 on cabal seems to imply v2 or later. So I think we can close this issue.
Sounds good; Rasa is now GPLv3 with the exception of the text-lens
library (which is independent of yi-rope); I'll publish the new versions to Hackage ASAP.
Thanks for your help and co-operation on this everyone!
Maybe I'm a bit late but I just saw the license discussion on reddit. You mentioned that you don't know the exact differences so I thought it might be a good idea to create this issue as a reminder and to help you out:
"Choose a license" is a nice website which gives you a short comparison of popular licenses.
PS: I would really love to see rasa published under GPL 😃