I have a question about the design of the extension system. Let me just take an example:
The vim extension will call addBottomStatus, which makes it depend on a particular way the views extension works. Furthermore, it means that the vim extension won't interact with some other "status-like" extension the user might have enabled.
Would it not be better for the vim extension to emit an event instead?
I realize that in this particular instance it might have just been a shortcut, the more general question is: when should an extension expose an action rather than listening for events?
Followup question: moving over to events would only partially solve the problem since the event's type would still be defined in the views extension. So I suppose we would also need extensions whose sole purpose is to provide canonical event types for other extensions to use?
I have a question about the design of the extension system. Let me just take an example:
The
vim
extension will calladdBottomStatus
, which makes it depend on a particular way theviews
extension works. Furthermore, it means that thevim
extension won't interact with some other "status-like" extension the user might have enabled.Would it not be better for the
vim
extension to emit an event instead?I realize that in this particular instance it might have just been a shortcut, the more general question is: when should an extension expose an action rather than listening for events?
Followup question: moving over to events would only partially solve the problem since the event's type would still be defined in the
views
extension. So I suppose we would also need extensions whose sole purpose is to provide canonical event types for other extensions to use?