ChrisTitusTech / website

My HUGO Website that I use for Videos, Blogs, and Redirects
87 stars 46 forks source link

tiny11-has-problems/ #133

Open utterances-bot opened 1 year ago

utterances-bot commented 1 year ago

Tiny11 Has Problems

Having Fun with Technology

https://christitus.com/tiny11-has-problems/

0xCUB3 commented 1 year ago

very good information. Always make your own!

eru123 commented 1 year ago

We love adventure, so we build it 👌👍

pears0 commented 1 year ago

Would it be possible to link your videos or guides for doing your own cleared down install of win 11?

bers817 commented 1 year ago

Thanks for this Chris, been missing your YouTube videos.

MaeXine commented 1 year ago

is building tiny11 better than MSMG Toolkit for making a slimmed down version of win?

fbifido commented 1 year ago

Hi, Please do a video of you creating your own copy of Tiny11.

rhyshka commented 1 year ago

Just tried this roll your own tiny11, it works under Vmware next stop on a Dell min1012 with only 2GB of RAM !

sinni800 commented 1 year ago

Can you please advise against sasnet next? They are now selling their Windows 11 build(!!) that has everything, including updates and Store ("because it didnt work") ripped out. So that means no native apps like photo viewer and such, which is "outdated software anyway, just use IrfanView" [sic].

Reading their site you will see a LOT of red flags

ibay770 commented 1 year ago

Not sure why everyone is complaining. I haven't seen any issues and you don't have to use it if you don't like it.

pears0 commented 1 year ago

Not sure why everyone is complaining. I haven't seen any issues and you don't have to use it if you don't like it.

Probably has something to do with spreading Malware is illegally, as well as sharing an edited copy of Windows being against Microsofts terms of service.

ibay770 commented 1 year ago

Doesn't seem like malware to me, I haven't seen any malicious tools in there. And I wouldn't worry about their ToS. If I understand correctly, the owner of their machine has the right to decide what they want on it and what they do not and can take any and all steps necessary to achieve that goal.

pears0 commented 1 year ago

Doesn't seem like malware to me, I haven't seen any malicious tools in there. And I wouldn't worry about their ToS. If I understand correctly, the owner of their machine has the right to decide what they want on it and what they do not and can take any and all steps necessary to achieve that goal.

Someone clearly didn't watch the video.

ibay770 commented 1 year ago

Not every video is truth.

On Apr 17, 2023 at 1:08 AM, Marc Pearson @.***> wrote:

Doesn't seem like malware to me, I haven't seen any malicious tools in there. And I wouldn't worry about their ToS. If I understand correctly, the owner of their machine has the right to decide what they want on it and what they do not and can take any and all steps necessary to achieve that goal.

Someone clearly didn't watch the video.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ChrisTitusTech/website/issues/133#issuecomment-1510818428, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADLKVLYPOHXKZHP4MEZSMITXBTT7RANCNFSM6AAAAAAWWTQOQE . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

martin-braun commented 1 year ago

@ibay770 He never said that tiny11 has viruses, he just said the probability is too great that it has.

@ChrisTitusTech Some programs like UTM on MacOS (to virtualize Windows on MacOS) can't handle custom ISOs at all when it comes to Windows. It would not just be nice to have a video about building your own tiny11 ISO, but also about turning a stock Windows 11 into a tiny11, effectively de-bloating it.

Greetings from Germany.

sinni800 commented 1 year ago

You can read the tiny11 creation script and go from there. The one here: https://github.com/ntdevlabs/tiny11builder

FunkyMonkey95 commented 1 year ago

Interestingly the only person who seems to be wanting to try and warn people away from free stripped/de-bloated Windows is the person selling a Windows de-bloater for $10.

The irony and conflict of interest is deafening.

pears0 commented 1 year ago

He also suggests to use the tiny11 scripts after verifying they’re not injecting malicious code, but use the official Windows .exe when it comes to building the image back up …..

From: FunkyMonkey95 @.> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 9:23 AM To: ChrisTitusTech/website @.> Cc: Marc Pearson | i-Neda Ltd @.>; Comment @.> Subject: Re: [ChrisTitusTech/website] tiny11-has-problems/ (Issue #133)

Interestingly the only person who seems to be wanting to try and warn people away from free stripped/de-bloated Windows is the person selling a Windows de-bloater for $10.

The irony and conflict of interest is deafening.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ChrisTitusTech/website/issues/133#issuecomment-1514331309, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJPWMXQROWCEAWDO2S6YHDXB6OF5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAWWTQOQE. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.**@.>>

chrisjlocke commented 1 year ago

Check your router if you use tiny 11. Have seen some weird entries in my port forwarding not added by me, pointing to the IP of the tiny11 setup.

XPower7125 commented 1 year ago

don't think that ALL windows superlites are bad/loaded with malware I am a windows modder myself and all the post-setup stuff for my superlite is open source

bravomail commented 1 year ago

Tiny11 indeed has prtoblems, but most of them are fixed in another project - https://github.com/bravomail/tinier11

DeckardKain commented 9 months ago

The problem i have with this 'tech' is that he makes claims of

Botnets
Viruses
Keyloggers
Crypto Miners

but gives no evidence other than.. woooah take a look at Oscdimg binary. Its kiloBITS don't match lol.

This video feels like tech propaganda.

chrisjlocke commented 9 months ago

But they're all possibilities with software from unknown sources. Its a legitimate warning to people who would simply run the ISO and use the software without being made aware .. better to be told of the possibilities rather than load up unknown software and have your data stolen.

DeckardKain commented 9 months ago

But they're all possibilities with software from unknown sources. Its a legitimate warning to people who would simply run the ISO and use the software without being made aware .. better to be told of the possibilities rather than load up unknown software and have your data stolen.

So this applies to all software, ok? What sources do you trust and just because it has a big name does it mean you can trust it?

My issue is CHRIS makes all these claims of viruses, botnets etc without any legitimate REAL evidence. With this obviously false approach, we could say the sky is falling everyone! Sure, its a possibility with everything that is unknown in the universe but is there any evidence that the sky is falling? The TRUTH is Chris makes a bunch of claims with no evidence other than the kiloBITS are different that he FEELS is suspicious. It isn't RIGHT of him to say botnets, viruses, keyloggers and crypto miners when he has ZERO evidence of it. There is no rebuttal to this. THE END.

chrisjlocke commented 9 months ago

It isn't RIGHT of him to say botnets, viruses, keyloggers and crypto miners when he has ZERO evidence of it

But you haven't proved the software doesn't have botnets, viruses, etc.

There is more of a chance that it does than it doesn't. The fact Tiny11 creates port forwarder rules on your router without your knowledge or permission (so essentially a backdoor into your whole OS) is enough to know it can't be trusted.

There is no rebuttal to this

Of course not. Your argument is totally solid. Can't pick holes in it at all. Nothing to see here.

DeckardKain commented 9 months ago

It isn't RIGHT of him to say botnets, viruses, keyloggers and crypto miners when he has ZERO evidence of it

But you haven't proved the software doesn't have botnets, viruses, etc.

There is more of a chance that it does than it doesn't. The fact Tiny11 creates port forwarder rules on your router without your knowledge or permission (so essentially a backdoor into your whole OS) is enough to know it can't be trusted.

There is no rebuttal to this

Of course not. Your argument is totally solid. Can't pick holes in it at all. Nothing to see here.

I never said i was out to claim it didn't.

The port forwarding rules posted from a previous user could have been from any device or software on his network. He has UPNP or a derivative running when you shouldn't OK. It is worth noting sure, but we need more evidence. He didn't even provide a netstat to see if his machine was listening or communicating on those ports.

Thank you for agreeing that my argument is totally solid because it is.