search

Chrismontano129 / STA9750-2024-FALL

Projects from STA 9750 Fall 2024
0 stars 0 forks source link

STA9750 Chrismontano129 MiniProject #01 #2

Open Chrismontano129 opened 4 weeks ago

Chrismontano129 commented 4 weeks ago

Hi @michaelweylandt!

I've uploaded my work for MiniProject #01 - check it out!

https://chrismontano129.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp01.html

michaelweylandt commented 4 weeks ago

Link doesn't work. Are you sure you uploaded docs/mp01.html? (Git add/stage, then git commit, finally git push.)

Chrismontano129 commented 4 weeks ago
Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 11 28 18 PM
Chrismontano129 commented 4 weeks ago

i sent you a submission of the work on brightspace for proof

Chrismontano129 commented 4 weeks ago
Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 11 30 28 PM
michaelweylandt commented 4 weeks ago

If the git screen in RStudio looks like that, it means you have not committed or pushed that file.

You need to hit the "Commit" button to get the "Commit" pop-up menu; once there, type a commit message, and then hit the "Commit" to actually make a commit. Once that is done, hit "Push" to send the commit (containing the file) to GitHub.

Chrismontano129 commented 4 weeks ago
Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 11 33 33 PM
michaelweylandt commented 4 weeks ago

Ok - so you've done the commit successfully. Now you just need to hit the Push button.

Chrismontano129 commented 4 weeks ago

same

Screenshot 2024-09-25 at 11 37 21 PM
michaelweylandt commented 4 weeks ago

Good - now it works. (Try the original link - no more "Page Not Found.")

Now that the deadline has passed, you need to take some time and internalize this workflow. We'll be using it throughout this course.

Chrismontano129 commented 4 weeks ago

thank you professor and with 3 minutes to spare!

michaelweylandt commented 3 weeks ago

Thanks @chrismontano129 !

Peer Feedback:

It is now time for the peer feedback round for Mini-Project #01. Please review @chrismontano129's submission for this mini-project and provide peer feedback.

Using the rubric at https://michael-weylandt.com/STA9750/miniprojects/mini01.html#rubric, please grade their submission out of a total of 50 points.

For each of the five categories, please give them a separate score and provide a total (sum) score across the entire assignment. Feel free to assign extra credit if you feel it is warranted (following the rubric).

If you give a score of less than 5 for any category, please provide a suggestion for improvement. (You can also give suggestions for any element they did well - more feedback is always great!)

As you go through this peer feedback exercise, think about what you particularly like about this submission and how you can incorporate that approach in your future work. If something is particularly insightful or creative, give some kudos!

Evaluators: This should take you around 15 minutes per peer feedback. You are not required to engage in substantial back-and-forth with @chrismontano129, but you are of course welcome to initiate a discussion.

@chrismontano129: please engage fully with your peers. They are here to help you!

Submission URL should be: https://chrismontano129.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp01.html

Feel free to link to other repos, the course documentation, or other useful examples.

Thanks! @michaelweylandt

CC: @charles-ramirez

Harry-2099 commented 3 weeks ago

Looks really good, I liked the analysis behind each of the questions. I would've liked to see some more of the tables or charts since that's more digestible than in paragraph form. Written Communication - 10 Project Skeleton - 10 Formatting & Display -9 Code Quality - 10 Data prep - 10 Total: 49

whaleron commented 3 weeks ago

Written Communication - 9 Project Skeleton - 9 Formatting & Display -10 Code Quality - 10 Data prep - 10 Additional points - 2 Total: 50

I liked the creativity that the code is collapsed; questions are correctly answered, the table of contents helps to navigate the page quickly, and additional questions gave more cool insights.

Victor-Louie commented 3 weeks ago

Written Communication - 9 Project Skeleton - 10 Formatting & Display - 9 Code Quality - 10 Data prep - 10 Total: 49 The analysis was done correctly, but the tables could be formatted better.

charles-ramirez commented 3 weeks ago

Hi, @greazyz,

This is just a reminder that your peer review is due today at 11:45 pm.

greazyz commented 3 weeks ago

Hi Chris,

I think it is very creative to have the code close away, making the site easy to read the answers. However, it distracts me from the overall report as I am slowing down to understand each code by clicking on it. You can choose to show only some of the code.

Written Communication: 10 Project Skeleton: 10 Formatting & Display: 9 Code Quality: 10

Score: 49/50