ChristianLa91 / slimdx

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/slimdx
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Is the any CPU idea mentioned last year for the Slim DX 2 version shaping up yet? #794

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Last year there was mention of doing a redesign of Slim DX in version 2. Is 
there any progress in this department? Our product is provided as a collection 
of Any CPU dll's.

Wout

Original issue reported on code.google.com by w...@woutware.com on 3 May 2011 at 12:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Yes, we've been working on it for a while now. Note that you can generally 
achieve the same effect with the current version of SlimDX by referencing the 
SlimDX assemblies in the GAC; it simply requires that the SlimDX installer 
install both versions.

Original comment by Mike.Popoloski on 3 May 2011 at 10:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This isn't really a bug report.

Original comment by josh.petrie on 6 May 2011 at 2:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hi Mike,

Cool! Well, we don't want to force our customer to register in the GAC. So the 
SlimDX version 2, with the plan you guys outlined last year for that would work 
with a non-GAC any CPU build is the only usable solution in our case.

Original comment by w...@woutware.com on 12 May 2011 at 9:30