Closed lynchbomb closed 4 years ago
Duplicate of #177 which was changed in #210
Seems like the documentation does suggest to use the SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE
notation (https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json). Although I am getting confused as this point, as NPM previously stated that the LicenseRef-LICENSE
is the appropriate format: https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/8795#issuecomment-119760485
I will have to ask for legal advice if we are allowed to use the BSD-3-Clause identifier instead of our custom reference, but not sure what the timeline on that request is.
I received confirmation we are allowed to update our license reference to BSD-3-Clause
. #215 has the update.
Thank You!!
https://github.com/ChromeDevTools/devtools-protocol/blob/fb81f45df6d9b0bbe78b593d00882e9a8bbf2a93/package.json#L7
Appears the LICENSE is
BSD-3-Clause
(https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause) yet is marked as a custom licenseLicenseRef-LICENSE
.