Open ChrysanthemumT opened 4 months ago
[IMPORTANT!: Please do not edit or reply to this comment using the GitHub UI. You can respond to it using CATcher during the next phase of the PE]
Thank you for the bug report.
Our team has decided to reject this bug, as our UG specifies both formats DATETIME
and DATE
fields at the start of the Features section.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]
tested initally with T9:00, found out its not accepted as a correct datetime format, realise its only HH:MM. Small issue but it would be nice to be direct in the ug, to avoid all misconceptions, instead of allowing the user to interpret the examples to use the command