Open MeiliMa opened 2 years ago
Hi @MeiliMa,
Thank you for bringing it to our attention! We were unaware of the Trajectron++ bug when we conducted our experiment. And thank you for conducting new experiments! I'll look into it and get back to you later.
I found that your implementation uses an old version of Trajectron++ code with bugs during data reprocessing (see StanfordASL/Trajectron-plus-plus#53). I tried to reproduce the reported results using the last code of Trajectron++ with that bug fixed. The following are the results I achieved:
I used your implementation with the default configs to reproduce the results. Could you confirm if there is anything wrong during my reproducing the results?