Open opoplawski opened 1 year ago
With the Fedora clamav packages we can end up with on update something like the following in /var/lib/clamav:
-rw-r-----. 1 clamupdate clamupdate 192051712 Feb 20 15:05 daily.cld -rw-r--r--. 1 clamupdate clamupdate 60748805 Feb 18 17:53 daily.cvd
With an up-to-date daily.cld file created by freshclam and an out of date daily.cvd file provided by the clamav-data package.
When freshclam is run, it appears to ignore the daily.cld file and rebuilds daily.cld based on daily.cvd:
Current working dir is /var/lib/clamav/ check_for_new_database_version: Local copy of daily found: daily.cvd. query_remote_database_version: daily.cvd version from DNS: 26818 daily database available for update (local version: 26816, remote version: 26818) Current database is 2 versions behind. Downloading database patch # 26817... .... updatedb: Running g_cb_download_complete callback... download_complete_callback: Download complete for database : /var/lib/clamav/tmp.daaadde252/clamav-aef57e9a87d7d7725d97dbd708f8c73d.tmp-daily.cld download_complete_callback: fc_context->bTestDatabases : 1 download_complete_callback: fc_context->bBytecodeEnabled : 1 Testing database: '/var/lib/clamav/tmp.daaadde252/clamav-aef57e9a87d7d7725d97dbd708f8c73d.tmp-daily.cld' ... Loading signatures from /var/lib/clamav/tmp.daaadde252/clamav-aef57e9a87d7d7725d97dbd708f8c73d.tmp-daily.cld Properly loaded 2021302 signatures from /var/lib/clamav/tmp.daaadde252/clamav-aef57e9a87d7d7725d97dbd708f8c73d.tmp-daily.cld Database test passed. daily.cld updated (version: 26818, sigs: 2021302, f-level: 90, builder: raynman) fc_update_database: daily.cld updated.
This does not seem optimal. Shouldn't freshclam check the existing daily.cld file first?
On Fedora 38:
I agree with you. It should probably check which is the newest and delete the older one.
Describe the bug
With the Fedora clamav packages we can end up with on update something like the following in /var/lib/clamav:
With an up-to-date daily.cld file created by freshclam and an out of date daily.cvd file provided by the clamav-data package.
When freshclam is run, it appears to ignore the daily.cld file and rebuilds daily.cld based on daily.cvd:
This does not seem optimal. Shouldn't freshclam check the existing daily.cld file first?
How to reproduce the problem
On Fedora 38: