codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Attention: 22 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
0cb9b2a) 96.56% compared to head (6ec61ca) 35.39%.:exclamation: Current head 6ec61ca differs from pull request most recent head fc19eb6. Consider uploading reports for the commit fc19eb6 to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #507 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 96.56% 35.39% -61.18% =========================================== Files 186 187 +1 Lines 8591 8631 +40 Branches 1276 1283 +7 =========================================== - Hits 8296 3055 -5241 - Misses 222 5576 +5354 + Partials 73 0 -73 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/507/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/507/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | `?` | | | [sanity](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/507/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | `35.39% <45.00%> (+0.04%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/507?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [plugins/module\_utils/constants.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/507?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet#diff-cGx1Z2lucy9tb2R1bGVfdXRpbHMvY29uc3RhbnRzLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [plugins/modules/aci\_system\_endpoint\_controls.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/507?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet#diff-cGx1Z2lucy9tb2R1bGVzL2FjaV9zeXN0ZW1fZW5kcG9pbnRfY29udHJvbHMucHk=) | `43.58% <43.58%> (ø)` | | ... and [181 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/507/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
…ols, ip aging, ep loop protection and roque endpoint control with aci_system_endpoint_controls module
This is a single module (aci_system_endpoint_controls) from a larger PR of tim cragg https://github.com/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/419
Splitting up the module for easier review