codecov[bot]
commented
2 weeks ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 35.75%. Comparing base (
555a942) to head (a55c799). Report is 6 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #663 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 58.46% 35.75% -22.72% =========================================== Files 269 266 -3 Lines 12352 12165 -187 Branches 1862 1837 -25 =========================================== - Hits 7222 4349 -2873 - Misses 5002 7816 +2814 + Partials 128 0 -128 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/663/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/663/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | `?` | | | [sanity](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/663/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | `35.75% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unit](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CiscoDevNet/ansible-aci/pull/663/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet) | `?` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CiscoDevNet#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Minor bugfix - the l3extMember object uses side instead of name to build the DN, so the module should configure the side attribute instead of the name (I believe the name attribute is left as null if you build an l3extMember object through the APIC GUI).