Open thekaveman opened 7 years ago
Should Jekyll generate dedicated pages for each of the domains or should we just have JS update the links for each of the charts to the respective folder of data?
I think the latter (update the data inline) would be more appealing from a UI/UX point of view. What do you think?
I'd be in favor of updating things in place, like you said seems cleaner
Preliminary support for this has begun on the feature/domain-selector-47
branch. Right now, I'm replacing all of the calls to the aggregated data to calls to individual data. However, there are some websites (e.g. Annual Report) that doesn't have "real-time" data so the "X people on City websites now" can't be updated. Thoughts?
Did we exclude certain sites from real-time due to GA quotas?
In any case, can we just hide the "X people on site now" counter for those sites that don't have real-time? We can revisit why those sites don't have real-time later, if needed.
Did we exclude certain sites from real-time due to GA quotas?
Yup
can we just hide the "X people on site now" counter for those sites that don't have real-time
Sure, I'll do that
Related to #46, this would give users another way to view the data that may lend more/different insight.