Civcraft / JukeAlert

Do not open issues here; open them on the maintained fork @ DevotedMC
https://github.com/DevotedMC/JukeAlert
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
5 stars 15 forks source link

Add ability to /jamute private group (in UI, can just be default when no group specified) #12

Closed GavJenks closed 9 years ago

GavJenks commented 9 years ago

Also, it would be nice if you didn't have to retype this in every single session for every group.

rourke750 commented 9 years ago

just do /jamute *

GavJenks commented 9 years ago

Cool thanks (edited out other response, thought it was to another issue)

rourke750 commented 9 years ago

So is this an issue?

GavJenks commented 9 years ago

Wait yes this is still an issue, I misunderstood. The asterisk just mutes EVERYTHING. I was looking for a way to mute ONLY the private group but not other groups. Have been trying it and just realized that it muted everything...

rourke750 commented 9 years ago

/jamute On Jan 17, 2015 1:50 AM, "GavJenks" notifications@github.com wrote:

Wait yes this is still an issue, I misunderstood. The asterisk just mutes EVERYTHING. I was looking for a way to mute ONLY the private group but not other groups. Have been trying it and just realized that it muted everything...

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/12#issuecomment-70357237.

GavJenks commented 9 years ago

The private group does not have a groupname, so can't do that

But nevermind. Ttk's post on reddit clarified that citadel 3 is doing away with private group anyway, do that would make this moot.

rourke750 commented 9 years ago

The private group name is your name? On Jan 19, 2015 4:21 PM, "GavJenks" notifications@github.com wrote:

The private group does not have a groupname, so can't do that

But nevermind. Ttk's post on reddit clarified that citadel 3 is doing away with private group anyway, do that would make this moot.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Civcraft/JukeAlert/issues/12#issuecomment-70563112.