Open pw0908 opened 2 years ago
They didn't convert to residual Helmholtz energy, darn.
They use the standard chain term so it should be just a matter of copying our code from SAFT into this eos. However, they've lost the cubic form so we'll probably need to label this eos as a generic one.
The loss of the cubic nature is a pretty big loss
they use the elliot RDF, that is g(β) = 1/(1 - 0.475*β)
. the original CPC paper shows the explicit residual helmholtz energy form.
Should we classify it as a SAFT or a cubic?
Probably more of a SAFT but really disappointing they don't use the association term...
Interesting cross over between the chain term in SAFT and a cubic equation of state: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00902