Open CharWS opened 2 years ago
Icy Touch partial resists working as expected now, however frost fever is still limited to 10% and 20% resists.
Did some additional review of beta logs on Sapphiron with and without Curse of the Elements.
With CoE Damage done (percent): 100 | Casts: 363/677 | Relative: 53.6% Damage done (percent): 90 | Casts: 217/677 | Relative: 32.1% Damage done (percent): 80 | Casts: 97/677 | Relative: 14.3% Average damage done: 0.9393
Without CoE Damage done (percent): 100 | Casts: 0/6893 | Relative: 0.0% Damage done (percent): 80 | Casts: 790/6893 | Relative: 11.5% Damage done (percent): 70 | Casts: 2487/6893 | Relative: 36.1% Damage done (percent): 60 | Casts: 2722/6893 | Relative: 39.5% Damage done (percent): 50 | Casts: 894/6893 | Relative: 13.0% Average damage done: 0.646
(Data is excluding frost fever as it was only having 10 and 20% partial resists and not scaling up to higher partial resist values at higher target resistance values) Thanks to Chaotic for the help
Description
Enemy Binary and Non-Binary Resistances seem to be behaving strangely as of the last round of raid testing on beta. If someone is able to do testing it could be done as follows:
Alternatively if someone has example logs where they fought Sapphiron with Curse of the Elements active could use those logs and compare resist outcomes to get a better picture of how resistance outcomes are shifting based on target resistance values.
Current Data
Here's an example from beta testing where can see that Sapphiron resisted 29.3% of binary casts of Icy Touch, however the partial non-binary resists are only appearing at the 10% and 20% values, having enough spell resistance to resist 29.3% of binary spells should result in non-binary resistance values occuring in the 30% and 40% range as well.
Formulas
Damage reduction percentage = 100% * effective resistance rating / ( K + effective resistance rating ) For level 83 boss mobs K is believed to be 510.
For binary spells Resistance reduces the chance for the binary spell to land by a certain percentage. Spell hit will not reduce this chance. It is assumed that this percentage is exactly the damage reduction percentage given above. The probability of an x% resistance is given by the following formula (AR is the average resistance calculated above):
P(x) = 50% - 250%*|x - AR|
Using these formulas and checking the binary resist outcomes of Sapphiron it's clear that either binary or non-binary (more likely) resistance values are not working properly on beta.
Historical Sources
I couldn't find any specific sources stating Sapphiron's expected frost resistance values but there are a number of sources that note that Sapphiron does have more frost resistance than other bosses in Naxxramas.