Closed yellowcap closed 3 months ago
Hi @yellowcap do you have a sense of when this might be possible by? We're hoping to be able to fully work with patch-level embeddings and further explore their usefulness as soon as possible to inform next steps for our app development!
Its in progress, if we don't hit an unexpected roadblock, it should be done this week.
That's great to hear, thank you!
hi @yellowcap any update here or any roadblocks? Maybe @brunosan can help out if there's any blockers.
not sure if already in scope, but also the option to not average the band groups.
We made good progress, I will review #172 today and hopefully we can merge that soon.
Yes @lauracchen I'm incorporating Daniel and Wei Ji's comments today, so #172 should be merged by Monday morning.
@lauracchen patch level bounding box, date and cloud cover information have been addressed in #172 and #184 respectively, both of which are merged into main now. The notebooks to demonstrate are docs/tutorial_digital_earth_pacific_patch_level.ipynb
and docs/patch_level_cloud_cover.ipynb
.
They use the Digital Earth Pacific data (#140) to focus the examples.
thank you so much!! @lillythomas
Closing this as done, let's reopen or make a new ticket for additional questions.
To further enable patch level embeddings, two tasks:
predict.py
routine outputs patch level embedding bounding box.This ticket is to track your request for patch level embeddings for bboxes @danhammer