Closed brunosan closed 1 month ago
Actually we don’t really need to wait for 0.2 to finish, we could take any currently saved checkpoint from the EC2 right?
Yes that is correct @brunosan do you have the MGRS tiles identified that we would want to include? Any time range of interest?
Yes that is correct @brunosan do you have the MGRS tiles identified that we would want to include? Any time range of interest?
Latest but fine anytime say 5 years. We just want to avoid locations that dissapeared from the set labels.
MGRSs are 49LHL, 50LKR, 49MHM, 50MKS, 50MLS, 50LLR
.
Note: See https://github.com/Clay-foundation/office/issues/170#issuecomment-2018008564 for very partial coverage when running the standard datacube.py
Closing as out of date, feel free to re-open if appropriate.
To support the similarity search in our testbed of Bali, we are trying to improve the algorithm on #186 but I think it would help if we can take v0.2 and resume training only with Bali data for a few epochs. I believe this should increase the performace of similarity search, as a temporary solution to build the app UX/UI
Assigning to @yellowcap only to assign back to me once the v0.2 is released and I can pick it up to resume trainning.
cc @MaceGrim