Closed micat001 closed 2 years ago
I mostly got this ironed out. It seemed to be related the resize and image reading utilities used as the original imports from scipy.misc
are deprecated.
I replaced all import of scipy.misc.imresize
with from skimage.transform import resize as imresize
and all imports of scipy.misc.imread
with from imageio import imread
.
For Sequence 10:
Sequence | ATE | RE |
---|---|---|
10 (My repo copy) | 0.0148 (std 0.0096) | 0.0042 (std 0.0027) |
10 (Repo Results) | 0.0141 (std 0.0115) | 0.0018 (std 0.0011) |
Still differences, but not so large.
I'm using Python 3.8, Torch 1.11 for reference but was able to achieve equivalent results on Python 3.9. I'll go ahead and close this issue.
Hi,
sorry for the lack of response. Glad you could sort it out. Care to do a PR to solve the problem ?
Otherwie I'll try to rectify it myself in a few days.
Clément
I've written up my changes in a PR here: #138
Hi - I'm trying to generate pose predictions using either of the provided models. Unfortunately, running test_pose.py from a clean install seems to generate much larger errors than you're seeing.
Regardless of the torch/numpy version (new, using requirements.txt or forcing old versions per issue 23) I get huge errors:
Is this reproducible by others? It seems like maybe something is incorrect in my odometry setup, as that's really the only part not cribbed directly from this repo. I can reproduce the ground truth trajectories for the two sequences correctly though. So the ground truth odometry seems accurate.