Breaking speed not working as intended (?)

[nixord]

Hi again! Ive been trying out the breaking speed relics but it seems none of them affect the breaking speed of blocks at all. Ive tried with my modifiers as possible but I cant see any difference in the speed whatsoever. Is the difference supposed to be tiny or is the mod slightly bugged?

[CleverNucleus]

Hi there, The difference should be small, but I think the average value would be noticeable. I will add this to the list of things to take a look at. For now, I would advise trying it with just RelicEx and its dependencies installed to rule out unwanted mod interactions. Additionally, perhaps take a look to see if you notice a difference in block breaking speed if you increase the attribute value using the vanilla command or by a Data Attributes data pack and skilling it with PlayerEx. Thanks.

[nixord]

Ok! Thank you so much! I'd rather use Datapack but I STILL dont know how to use them. Are they easy to setup?

El mié, 22 feb 2023 a la(s) 15:55, CleverNucleus @.***) escribió:

Hi there, The difference should be small, but I think the average value would be noticeable. I will add this to the list of things to take a look at. For now, I would advise trying it with just RelicEx and its dependencies installed to rule out unwanted mod interactions. Additionally, perhaps take a look to see if you notice a difference in block breaking speed if you increase the attribute value using the vanilla command or by a Data Attributes data pack and skilling it with PlayerEx. Thanks.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CleverNucleus/RelicEx/issues/38#issuecomment-1440624192, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK3FW2DP7NOKHG64NUWUVJ3WYZOJDANCNFSM6AAAAAAVDZALZM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

[nixord]

Also I tried using a datapack to change crit behaviour to vanilla but its throwing me this exception:

java.util.concurrent.CompletionException: com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected BEGIN_OBJECT but was NUMBER at line 4 column 45 path $.values..

at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.encodeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:315) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.completeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:320) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1770) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.exec(CompletableFuture.java:1760) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:373) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1182) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1655) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1622) ~[?:?]

at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:165) ~[?:?]

El mié, 22 feb 2023 a la(s) 16:47, Nicolas Melnik @.***) escribió:

Ok! Thank you so much! I'd rather use Datapack but I STILL dont know how to use them. Are they easy to setup?

El mié, 22 feb 2023 a la(s) 15:55, CleverNucleus @.***) escribió:

Hi there, The difference should be small, but I think the average value would be noticeable. I will add this to the list of things to take a look at. For now, I would advise trying it with just RelicEx and its dependencies installed to rule out unwanted mod interactions. Additionally, perhaps take a look to see if you notice a difference in block breaking speed if you increase the attribute value using the vanilla command or by a Data Attributes data pack and skilling it with PlayerEx. Thanks.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CleverNucleus/RelicEx/issues/38#issuecomment-1440624192, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK3FW2DP7NOKHG64NUWUVJ3WYZOJDANCNFSM6AAAAAAVDZALZM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

[CleverNucleus]

It looks like you've got a syntax issue with your JSON - would you send over your datapack/json file(s) and I can take a look at them? Thanks.

[nixord]

Sure! Here it is!

El jue, 23 feb 2023 a la(s) 09:53, CleverNucleus @.***) escribió:

It looks like you've got a syntax issue with your JSON - would you send over your datapack/json file(s) and I can take a look at them? Thanks.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CleverNucleus/RelicEx/issues/38#issuecomment-1441720771, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK3FW2GON7MYVJYL24VOQBLWY5MULANCNFSM6AAAAAAVDZALZM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

[CleverNucleus]

Hi, I think that you have not attached anything to your message.

[nixord]

Oh whoops, youre right. Well tbh I deleted the whole thing cause it wasnt working at all and got frustrated but ummm... Once I get another datapack going and I get the same error Ill tell you! Also sorry for taking so long to comment on it.

[CleverNucleus]

No worries; I'll close this issue for now then, but if the problem reoccurs feel free to reopen it.