Open simone-silvestri opened 3 weeks ago
The question is, should we change this name to be similarity_theory also in coupled_model.fluxes? In that way, we would be a bit more straightforward.
The word turbulent
is used as a generalization of similarity_theory
--- for example if we wanted to compute turbulent fluxes with an alternative theory (not similarity theory --- for example constant drag coefficient / transfer coefficients).
That said I think we can 1) come up with a better name for the property or 2) forget about supporting constant transfer coefficients.
I am a bit puzzled by having
in this line https://github.com/CliMA/ClimaOcean.jl/blob/0cbb8a57838fbf2a11ed9991a1da2c21e487e131/src/OceanSeaIceModels/CrossRealmFluxes/atmosphere_ocean_fluxes.jl#L32
For me is a bit counterintuitive because
turbulent
can be a lot of things (for example turbulent fluxes), but similarity theory contains all the specific details to calculate the turbulent fluxes.The question is, should we change this name to be
similarity_theory
also incoupled_model.fluxes
? In that way, we would be a bit more straightforward.