Open francispoulin opened 3 months ago
What code are you running?
@simone-silvestri is this resolved by #80 ?
That error refers to the fact that the previous bathymetry data stored in the OceananigansArtifacts.jl
repo has been deleted.
On the other hand, that data is not necessary anymore. In #80 you can build a bathymetry with
bottom_height = regrid_bathymetry(grid, connected_regions_allowed = 0)
I suggest to also add the keyword argument interpolation_passes
to a value > 1 to smooth the bathymetry (the more passes the smoother the bathymetry).
Also note that the convention for the moment is that the bathymetry is between 0-degrees and 360-degree longitude (not -180 and 180). So construct your grid with longitude = (0, 360)
.
yeah and whatever code that is being ran, should be deleted or fixed
Also note that the convention for the moment is that the bathymetry is between 0-degrees and 360-degree longitude (not -180 and 180). So construct your grid with longitude = (0, 360).
This is a little cryptic. Can you make it so that the wrong choice throws an error? I don't understand what needs to be done.
This is the same issue I ran into a while back when running GlobalOceanBioME with one_degree_near_global_simulation. I have the missing bathymetry files on my local machine if you want them temporarily @francispoulin, but likely makes more sense to update to #80 as suggested rather than run the old code. Speaking of which, @glwagner I've been holding off but with #80 merged this may be now a good time to update GlobalOceanBioME to run with the newest CliMAOcean OMIP setup? If you in think it makes sense I'll start a separate discussion about this in the GlobalOceanBioME repo.
Also note that the convention for the moment is that the bathymetry is between 0-degrees and 360-degree longitude (not -180 and 180). So construct your grid with longitude = (0, 360).
This is a little cryptic. Can you make it so that the wrong choice throws an error? I don't understand what needs to be done.
For the moment a warning in the bathymetry right suffice I'll add it to #88
This is the same issue I ran into a while back when running GlobalOceanBioME with one_degree_near_global_simulation. I have the missing bathymetry files on my local machine if you want them temporarily @francispoulin, but likely makes more sense to update to #80 as suggested rather than run the old code. Speaking of which, @glwagner I've been holding off but with #80 merged this may be now a good time to update GlobalOceanBioME to run with the newest CliMAOcean OMIP setup? If you in think it makes sense I'll start a separate discussion about this in the GlobalOceanBioME repo.
I think it would be a good moment to update GlobalOceanBioME
.
Yes you can try that! We are working on validating CATKE for realistic global stuff. The latest Oceananigans also has a two-equation closure that can be tested. One missing piece I think is a near global configuration with restoring?
I opened a draft proposal for the restoring following the discussion in issue #81.
Thanks everyone for the replies!
@vtamsitt , that is very kind of you to offer but I don't need it right away. If the update includes bathymetry and winds, that would definitely solve my problem.
I was doing this today to prepare for a talk on Monday. I was fortunate to have a plot of topography from a while back. Sadly, I never plotted the winds at any time.
I am very excited to run this new code as I have been learning about OceanBioME recently and it'll be great to see it used in a global setting!
I guess we can return to this after #81 gets resolved. I'll keep it open in the mean time, unless peopel prefer that I close it.
I pointed this out on Oceananigans.jl, but when I try running this script I get an error when I try and access the data. Any idea how to resolve this error?