Closed simone-silvestri closed 3 months ago
Attention: 215 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
727a7d4
) 22.80% compared to head (77cd671
) 14.63%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
It's too much. Break it into smaller PRs. We aren't going to work this way.
more than three quarters of the changes in this PR are already in #24. This PR adds very little code beyond that. I would say, let's keep this waiting until #24 is merged
Ice-ocean stresses belong in the coupled model, not here in ClimaSeaIce. That will resolve the confusion about the role of the reference ice density and reference ocean density (we have places to specify those in OceanSeaIceModel
).
This probably means that the whole sea-ice momentum calculation might go in the OceanSeaIceModel
(I think that the ice-ocean stress needs to be calculated implicitly)
Can we please start with only one rheology?
Sure I can remove the CavitatingFlowRheology
and we can do that in a different PR
A new branch with a better structure is incoming when #24 is merged. So this can be closed
This PR introduces a leap-frog method to solve for the sea-ice momentum equations and a couple of simple "explicit" sea-ice Rheologies
together with @jm-c
requires #24