Change all occurrences of "Distribution(s)" to "PDistribution(s)"

[bielim]

This change will prevent conflicts with Julia's Distributions.jl package

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #38 into master will decrease coverage by 33.95%. The diff coverage is 0%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #38       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    97.1%   63.15%   -33.96%     
===========================================
  Files           5        6        +1     
  Lines         173      266       +93     
===========================================
  Hits          168      168               
- Misses          5       98       +93

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/PDistributions/PDistributions.jl	0% <0%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 7aff453...7699d6d. Read the comment docs.

[charleskawczynski]

Just to note, we could easily keep the name the same, and just create an alias:

using Cloudy
PDistributions = Cloudy.Distributions
using Distributions
# Now we can use both

[ali-ramadhan]

Could also

using Cloudy
import Distributions
d = Distributions.Normal()

or

using Cloudy
using Distributions: Normal
d = Normal()

[bischtob]

After thinking about this for a bit, I think we should go with Charlie's suggestion. @bielim, would that be OK with you?

[bischtob]

Hey, @charleskawczynski what are the code cov errors here. Not sure, I get it :).

[bischtob]

After thinking about this for a bit, I think we should go with Charlie's suggestion. @bielim, would that be OK with you?

Discussed this with Melanie. She's right that PDistributions might be a good name to have. Also because the PDistributions are not normalized.

[charleskawczynski]

Hey, @charleskawczynski what are the code cov errors here. Not sure, I get it :).

It's reporting that none of the newly added code is in the test suite (the tests in this PR need to be included in runtests.jl)

Discussed this with Melanie. She's right that PDistributions might be a good name to have. Also because the PDistributions are not normalized.

And PDistributions over ParticleDistributions? Either way is fine with me, so long it's clear to users :)

[bischtob]

@bielim, can you address this :)?

[bielim]

Will do!