CliMA / EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl

Implements Optimization and approximate uncertainty quantification algorithms, Ensemble Kalman Inversion, and Ensemble Kalman Processes.
https://clima.github.io/EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl/dev
Apache License 2.0
85 stars 19 forks source link

JOSS paper review #222

Closed odow closed 1 year ago

odow commented 2 years ago

Hi all, I'm reviewing the JOSS paper: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/4869#issuecomment-1286002558

A couple of things jumped out at me, going off the JOSS checklist:

The paper is also quite long. I'd be in favor of shrinking the "features" section in favor of a small code example that demonstrated the package.

Thoughts?

odunbar commented 2 years ago

Hi @odow!

Thanks for the rapid feedback, I agree with your comments, particularly that an immediate visual could help users understand the package,

Here's a first list to address your comments. In the Docs:

In the paper:

Regarding the length, I've seen JOSS papers range from 1 paragraph to 6 pages, so I'm not sure if i necessarily agree that the length is extreme, but I know cutting can improve focus and conciseness. When you mention "shrinking", would you prefer less verbose language, or do you have specific pieces you feel readers would not miss being cut.

odow commented 2 years ago

I'd also move the statement of need to after the summary and before the "Features" section.

i necessarily agree that the length is extreme

I don't know if I said extreme, but it's heading towards the upper end, especially if you add an example with a figure.

When you mention "shrinking", would you prefer less verbose language, or do you have specific pieces you feel readers would not miss being cut.

I thought lines 46-61 could be cut in favor of a sentence like "We also implement a number of features recently described in the literature to improve the robustness and flexibility of the ensemble algorithms (cites...)." But perhaps add the example etc, the see how the length is before cutting.

odunbar commented 2 years ago

Thanks for the update and clarification. We will start working on this soon.

odunbar commented 1 year ago

Hi @odow Thank you for your patience, our changes:

The latest paper.pdf

odow commented 1 year ago

Looks good. I wonder if it's still a little long, but I'll leave that to the editors if they complain.