search

CliMA / LESbrary.jl

📚Generating Oceananigans large eddy simulation (LES) data for calibrating parameterizations
MIT License
28 stars 10 forks source link

NetCDF output #134

Closed sandreza closed 2 years ago

sandreza commented 2 years ago

We use julia, but if we want other people to easily parse and analyze the data generated by Oceananigans we should use NetCDF. This includes collaborators that have scripts that already read in NetCDF files and analyze the resulting data

glwagner commented 2 years ago

We include an option for creating NetCDF output writers in three_layer_constant_fluxes_simulation:

https://github.com/CliMA/LESbrary.jl/blob/9275cd3937cfedf2466af599cf08c9e319dd55d0/src/IdealizedExperiments/three_layer_constant_fluxes.jl#L377-L419

Is this feature what the issue is referring to? If it is then we support it for the only LESbrary setup we provide, so I think we can close this.

We don't really distribute data now (since we are actively developing the setups, eg #131) so I don't think this is something to consider yet.

sandreza commented 2 years ago

With the mesoscale simulations I'll want to start distributing them, but you're right that the feature is implemented! I'll do a quick test and then close the issue

glwagner commented 2 years ago

In that case this is an Oceananigans issue not LESbrary (eg do we support NetCDF?)

sandreza commented 2 years ago

Looks like it works! And @glwagner , agreed :)