Closed sandreza closed 2 years ago
It seems that the Roquet et. al paper uses a different sign convention in the following definition
as compared to what is in the package:
https://github.com/CliMA/SeawaterPolynomials.jl/blob/5f278c85e849d402de9d45f20fa3f227e0b8e6fc/src/TEOS10.jl#L68
This can lead to subtle sign errors that propagate to other code bases
I think we should add a minus sign to
we also have to update a test.
Thanks a lot @sandreza for finding this!
closed via #20
It seems that the Roquet et. al paper uses a different sign convention in the following definition
as compared to what is in the package:
https://github.com/CliMA/SeawaterPolynomials.jl/blob/5f278c85e849d402de9d45f20fa3f227e0b8e6fc/src/TEOS10.jl#L68
This can lead to subtle sign errors that propagate to other code bases