Closed navidcy closed 6 months ago
After expanding equation (17) in Roquet et al. (2015) the Θ₀
term becomes part of the R₀₀₀
coeffcient in the polynomial form for seawater density (equation (6) in Roquet et al. (2015)). Because it has no effect on ocean dynamics it was removed. There is a discussion relating to this here.
Should we add a remark in the docstring?
Should we add a remark in the docstring?
That is a good idea! I can get to it tomorrow if you like?
That'd be great
Equation (17) by Roquet et al. (2015) mentions
ρ' = R₁₀₀ Sᴬ + R₀₁₀ (Θ - Θ₀) - R₀₂₀ Θ² - R₀₁₁ Θ Z
while the docstring does not include theΘ₀
term:https://github.com/CliMA/SeawaterPolynomials.jl/blob/79045e7d140cde5ba21c86a5b7afe287108c2a21/src/SecondOrderSeawaterPolynomials.jl#L110-L112
Is it only a docstring problem? cc @glwagner