Follow-up for #165, since the coverage report was removed from there to reduce the scope, and Jasmine is now used instead of Jest.
It's a nice to have feature: separately measure coverage for each package (client-common, client-node, client-browser).
Follow-up for #165, since the coverage report was removed from there to reduce the scope, and Jasmine is now used instead of Jest. It's a nice to have feature: separately measure coverage for each package (
client-common,client-node,client-browser).