Closed BenjaminRCooper closed 10 years ago
+1
Say for something like site-head
, I've seen it being shortened to something like site-hd
. Similarly with footer. Would you say use a full word for readability too? Helps if new people jump on a project and wonder what all the short names are :)
+1
That would be me ha! I originally used this as it was an approach Nicole Sullivan used throughout her OOCSS resources.
I think we should stick to full words, like you say.
B
+1 on the full words, find it a million times easier.
My bad.
B
+1 for full and sensible words.
+1
Abbreviations such as ct
for example can be ambiguous.
Implemented.
Classes do not have any impact on semantics.
You SHOULD use the following to name your classes;
Don't worry about the length of the class name, the main thing is that it makes sense and it is understandable to yourself and the team