Potential Improvement: Implement Chain of Responsibility Pattern for Policy Handling

[randyRivera0]

I've noticed that the current policy handling mechanism could benefit from applying the Chain of Responsibility design pattern.

This pattern would enhance the system's flexibility, maintainability, and scalability.

By introducing a chain of handlers for different policy types, we can:

Decouple policy handling logic from the request origin.
Easily add or remove policy handlers without affecting existing code.
Improve code organization and readability.

I believe implementing this pattern would lead to a more robust and efficient policy handling system.

`interface Handler { void setNext(Handler handler); void handle(Request request); }

abstract class PolicyChangeHandler { protected Handler nextHandler;

public void setNext(Handler handler) {
    this.nextHandler = handler;
}

public void handle(Request request) {
    if (canHandle(request)) {
        processRequest(request);
    } else if (nextHandler != null) {
        nextHandler.handle(request);
    }
}

protected abstract boolean canHandle(Request request);
protected abstract void processRequest(Request request);

}

class PolicyChangeHandlerImpl extends PolicyChangeHandler { @Override protected boolean canHandle(Request request) { // Logic to determine if this handler can process the request return request.getType() == RequestType.POLICY; }

@Override
protected void processRequest(Request request) {
    // Logic to process the policy change request
    System.out.println("Handling policy change request.");
}

}

class RamPolicyChangeHandler extends PolicyChangeHandler { @Override protected boolean canHandle(Request request) { // Logic to determine if this handler can process the request return request.getType() == RequestType.RAM_POLICY; }

@Override
protected void processRequest(Request request) {
    // Logic to process the RAM policy change request
    System.out.println("Handling RAM policy change request.");
}

} `