Closed Andre601 closed 7 months ago
I decided to switch the operands to =~
and ~
to keep them similar in length and design to ther counterparts ==
and =
respectively.
Was thinking of doing ~~
but that feels a bit too ambigous, as nothing would hint at equality check here.
I didn't realize this has been sitting here for 3 weeks. Sorry for the delay.
Adds operators for case-insensitive equals checks (Including negated ones)
~==
and~=
can be used for equalsIgnoreCase check!~
can be used for negated equalsIgnoreCase checkI did
~==
as the equivalent to==
, tho I think~=
for it is better and just~
for=
?