Closed CodeWritingCow closed 3 months ago
Performance score was 67/100. Score took a hit due to the page's blocking time of 4.24 seconds.
Performance score was 61/100. Score took a hit due to the page's blocking time of 2.26 seconds.
Unassigned myself from this issue so other contributors can work on it. I've posted screenshots of the audit reports. Only things missing are report summaries and recommendations for improvement.
Hi @CodeWritingCow, can I be assigned this pls?
@zheyichn assigned! Thank you for taking this off my plate.
When I ran the Lighthouse report in my local incognito window, it displayed different results from the above screenshots. According to the screenshots above, the high total blocking time mainly penalized the performance score. However, I did not see total blocking time as a problem on my end. To provide improvement recommendations, I need to click in to see detailed information. Therefore, I have posted my screenshots below and will summarize based on these.
aria-*
attribute on nav
element.Largest Contentful Paint
taking 6.45 seconds.Largest Contentful Paint
taking 6 seconds.Load delay
(59% of LCP) - The delta between Time to first byte
and when the browser starts loading the LCP resource. (Performance)global.css
file into smaller files specific to different pages/components can help avoid loading unnecessary CSS. (Performance)aria-pressed
cannot be used on nav
element. Relevant to #727.@zheyichn thanks for digging into this. It seems image load delay and unused CSs are common issues on the website.
Describe the task
Audit performance of Clean and Green Philly's homepage using Google Lighthouse. Document audit results, including areas of improvement.
Acceptance Criteria
Additional context