Open titlecharacter opened 9 years ago
@bennovack see #56
@bennovack I really like @schlos's suggestion that users would only ever request to join projects, and then the maintainer would process that and designate a role for them
What would you imagine if the maintainer has lost interest, never responds, etc?
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Chris Alfano notifications@github.com wrote:
@bennovack I really like @schlos's suggestion that users would only ever request to join projects, and then the maintainer would process that and designate a role for them
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/CfABrigadePhiladelphia/laddr/issues/123#issuecomment-154264402
Good question. Maybe the number + duration of pending applications could be a good metric for brigade admins to spot inactive maintainers and either designate a new maintainer or update the project status. A project without an active and visible maintainer isn't going to get anywhere anyway so maybe this would offer a good forcing effect for that.
Also, brigade admins would have the same capabilities as the maintainer to take action without getting into changing maintainer yet.
I've looked through #56 too, @themightychris. I've also thought about our idea of creating "help wanted job postings" inspired by the site: https://openopps.digitalgov.gov/. I've determined that would be overkill for a "version 1" attempt.
Instead, let's start by adding a "participate button" that would sit next to "add" (which btw, I think we should hide unless you're a maintainer) button - which would load a mini popup form that has,
Projects should really have a "join" button that: