What is 'inputs' here and why we want to scale aggregated inputs by using response variable? Why aggregate inputs? Where is the role of weights in this equation? We can simply perform inner product of inputs with weight vector added with bias as input to activation function. Why this type of calculation is needed?
As given in config file description:
weight_mutate_power: The standard deviation of the zero-centered normal/gaussian distribution from which a weight value mutation is drawn.
https://neat-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/config_file.html
Response : These are the attributes of a node. They determine the output of a node as follows: activation(bias+(response∗aggregation(inputs))).
https://neat-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/glossary.html#term-response
What is 'inputs' here and why we want to scale aggregated inputs by using response variable? Why aggregate inputs? Where is the role of weights in this equation? We can simply perform inner product of inputs with weight vector added with bias as input to activation function. Why this type of calculation is needed?