Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Reminds me, there's also a "small thumbnail" size defined at 70x70px for
additional pictures, but generation of those thumbnails was disabled.
Original comment by rii...@gmail.com
on 31 Aug 2013 at 2:14
Original comment by rii...@gmail.com
on 29 Sep 2013 at 9:13
Makes no sense to save these to DB like the original picture and 250x250px
thumbnail currently are.
Unsure whether https://code.google.com/p/vocadb/issues/detail?id=114 should be
done first (moving the original picture & thumbnail out of DB and to the same
list as additional pictures).
I'm currently thinking the best way would be to have the original main picture
in the DB and all thumbnails (including the 250x250px) in external files. The
main picture is rarely requested, so performance isn't really an issue (at
least after https://code.google.com/p/vocadb/issues/detail?id=110 is solved).
Having it in the DB would make sure it's backed up with the rest of the DB, and
thumbnails can always be generated as long as the original still exists.
Moving the thumbnails out of the DB would require a migration. Supporting case
where the thumbnail may be in either DB or external file would be bad in the
long run, so all thumbnails should be generated at once, which may be
expensive. At the same time, thumbnails should be deleted from the database.
Original comment by rii...@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2013 at 6:52
Original main pictures are still saved in DB, but all thumbnails are now being
moved away from the DB. Currently done for albums, and will be done for artists
soon.
Original comment by rii...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2013 at 3:49
Original comment by rii...@gmail.com
on 30 Nov 2013 at 7:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rii...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2013 at 8:55