Codex- / await-remote-run

✅ Await the completion of a foreign repository Workflow Run given the Run ID.
MIT License
29 stars 8 forks source link

chore(deps): update all non-major dependencies #148

Closed renovate[bot] closed 1 year ago

renovate[bot] commented 1 year ago

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@types/node (source) ^18.11.18 -> ^18.11.19 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser ^5.50.0 -> ^5.51.0 age adoption passing confidence
esbuild ^0.17.5 -> ^0.17.6 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint ### [`v5.51.0`](https://togithub.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/parser/CHANGELOG.md#​5510-httpsgithubcomtypescript-eslinttypescript-eslintcomparev5500v5510-2023-02-06) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/compare/v5.50.0...v5.51.0) **Note:** Version bump only for package [@​typescript-eslint/parser](https://togithub.com/typescript-eslint/parser)
evanw/esbuild ### [`v0.17.6`](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#​0176) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/compare/v0.17.5...v0.17.6) - Fix a CSS parser crash on invalid CSS ([#​2892](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2892)) Previously the following invalid CSS caused esbuild's parser to crash: ```css @​media screen ``` The crash was caused by trying to construct a helpful error message assuming that there was an opening `{` token, which is not the case here. This release fixes the crash. - Inline TypeScript enums that are referenced before their declaration Previously esbuild inlined enums within a TypeScript file from top to bottom, which meant that references to TypeScript enum members were only inlined within the same file if they came after the enum declaration. With this release, esbuild will now inline enums even when they are referenced before they are declared: ```ts // Original input export const foo = () => Foo.FOO const enum Foo { FOO = 0 } // Old output (with --tree-shaking=true) export const foo = () => Foo.FOO; var Foo = /* @​__PURE__ */ ((Foo2) => { Foo2[Foo2["FOO"] = 0] = "FOO"; return Foo2; })(Foo || {}); // New output (with --tree-shaking=true) export const foo = () => 0 /* FOO */; ``` This makes esbuild's TypeScript output smaller and faster when processing code that does this. I noticed this issue when I ran the TypeScript compiler's source code through esbuild's bundler. Now that the TypeScript compiler is going to be bundled with esbuild in the upcoming TypeScript 5.0 release, improvements like this will also improve the TypeScript compiler itself! - Fix esbuild installation on Arch Linux ([#​2785](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2785), [#​2812](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2812), [#​2865](https://togithub.com/evanw/esbuild/issues/2865)) Someone made an unofficial `esbuild` package for Linux that adds the `ESBUILD_BINARY_PATH=/usr/bin/esbuild` environment variable to the user's default environment. This breaks all npm installations of esbuild for users with this unofficial Linux package installed, which has affected many people. Most (all?) people who encounter this problem haven't even installed this unofficial package themselves; instead it was installed for them as a dependency of another Linux package. The problematic change to add the `ESBUILD_BINARY_PATH` environment variable was reverted in the latest version of this unofficial package. However, old versions of this unofficial package are still there and will be around forever. With this release, `ESBUILD_BINARY_PATH` is now ignored by esbuild's install script when it's set to the value `/usr/bin/esbuild`. This should unbreak using npm to install `esbuild` in these problematic Linux environments. Note: The `ESBUILD_BINARY_PATH` variable is an undocumented way to override the location of esbuild's binary when esbuild's npm package is installed, which is necessary to substitute your own locally-built esbuild binary when debugging esbuild's npm package. It's only meant for very custom situations and should absolutely not be forced on others by default, especially without their knowledge. I may remove the code in esbuild's installer that reads `ESBUILD_BINARY_PATH` in the future to prevent these kinds of issues. It will unfortunately make debugging esbuild harder. If `ESBUILD_BINARY_PATH` is ever removed, it will be done in a "breaking change" release.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.



This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

codecov-commenter commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 83.95% // Head: 83.95% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:

Coverage data is based on head (c6654fd) compared to base (c831ffb). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #148 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 83.95% 83.95% ======================================= Files 2 2 Lines 81 81 Branches 18 18 ======================================= Hits 68 68 Misses 5 5 Partials 8 8 ``` Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Alex+Miller). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Alex+Miller)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.