Codium-ai / cover-agent

QodoAI Cover-Agent: An AI-Powered Tool for Automated Test Generation and Code Coverage Enhancement! πŸ’»πŸ€–πŸ§ͺ🐞
https://qodo.ai/
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
4.37k stars 327 forks source link

Dw/split run #233

Closed qododavid closed 3 days ago

qododavid commented 3 days ago

PR Type

enhancement


Description


Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Enhancement
CoverAgent.py
Refactor test generation process into separate methods     

cover_agent/CoverAgent.py
  • Split the run method into init and run_test_gen methods.
  • Added type hints for method parameters.
  • Refactored code to improve readability and maintainability.
  • +33/-19 
    UnitTestValidator.py
    Add type hints for methods and variables                                 

    cover_agent/UnitTestValidator.py
  • Added type hint for get_code_language method.
  • Added type hint for testing_framework variable.
  • +2/-2     
    Miscellaneous
    version.txt
    Update version number to 0.2.8                                                     

    cover_agent/version.txt - Updated version from 0.2.7 to 0.2.8.
    +1/-1     

    πŸ’‘ PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 days ago

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Reviewer Guide πŸ”

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 πŸ”΅πŸ”΅βšͺβšͺβšͺ
    πŸ§ͺ No relevant tests
    πŸ”’ No security concerns identified
    ⚑ Recommended focus areas for review

    Code Duplication
    The docstring description of initialization steps is duplicated between init() and the old run() method. Consider keeping it only in init(). Return Type Hint
    The init() method is missing return type hints for the tuple it returns (failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report) Documentation Gap
    The get_coverage() method's docstring states it returns None but actually returns a tuple of values
    codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 days ago

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add proper error handling to prevent cascading failures when initialization fails ___ **Add error handling for the case where init() fails to prevent the subsequent
    run_test_gen() from being called with invalid parameters.** [cover_agent/CoverAgent.py [254-256]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/233/files#diff-dac868643df79ec6dfcf446359468a88ba6a6617bb8ffa0139757f0fbf5195b1R254-R256) ```diff def run(self): - failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report = self.init() - self.run_test_gen(failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report) + try: + failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report = self.init() + self.run_test_gen(failed_test_runs, language, test_framework, coverage_report) + except Exception as e: + self.logger.error(f"Failed to initialize test generation: {e}") + if "WANDB_API_KEY" in os.environ: + wandb.finish() + raise ``` - [ ] **Apply this suggestion**
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding error handling is crucial for robustness, especially since the init() method performs critical setup operations. The suggestion properly handles cleanup (wandb.finish()) and provides error logging.
    8
    General
    Move state initialization to class level or initialization method to prevent state-related bugs ___ **Initialize iteration_count and test_results_list at the class level or in init()
    instead of run_test_gen() to avoid potential state issues between runs.** [cover_agent/CoverAgent.py [177-180]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/233/files#diff-dac868643df79ec6dfcf446359468a88ba6a6617bb8ffa0139757f0fbf5195b1R177-R180) ```diff +def init(self): + # Initialize variables to track progress + self.iteration_count = 0 + self.test_results_list = [] + # ... rest of init code ... + def run_test_gen(self, failed_test_runs: List, language: str, test_framework: str, coverage_report: str): - # Initialize variables to track progress - iteration_count = 0 - test_results_list = [] ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Moving state variables to class level or init() method is a good practice for better state management and reusability. This change would prevent potential issues with state persistence between multiple runs.
    7

    πŸ’‘ Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    EmbeddedDevops1 commented 3 days ago

    βŒ› Running regression tests: https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/actions/runs/11977225442