Tr/prompts2 - Githubissues

mrT23 commented 1 month ago

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests

Description

Updated the key from tests to new_tests in the dictionary used for generating and validating tests in cover_agent/main.py.
Modified test cases in tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py to use the new_tests key.
Updated the expected output in tests/test_load_yaml.py to reflect the new key.
Renamed the tests field to new_tests in the NewTests class within cover_agent/settings/test_generation_prompt.toml.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

main.py `Update dictionary key for generated tests` cover_agent/main.py Updated key from `tests` to `new_tests` in the dictionary used for generating and validating tests.	+1/-1
test_generation_prompt.toml `Rename tests field to new_tests in NewTests class` cover_agent/settings/test_generation_prompt.toml Renamed `tests` field to `new_tests` in the `NewTests` class. Updated example output to reflect the new key.	+3/-3

Tests

test_UnitTestGenerator.py `Update test cases to use new_tests key` tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py Modified test cases to use `new_tests` key instead of `tests`. Updated validation logic to reflect the new key.	+4/-4
test_load_yaml.py `Update YAML parsing test to use new_tests key` tests/test_load_yaml.py Changed expected output to use `new_tests` key in YAML parsing test.	+1/-1

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward, involving only renaming of a dictionary key across multiple files. The PR is well-documented and the changes are consistent across the application and tests.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add a check to ensure `generated_tests['new_tests']` exists and is a list before iterating ___ Consider adding a check to ensure `generated_tests['new_tests']` exists and is a list before iterating over it. This will prevent potential runtime errors if the structure of `generated_tests` changes. [tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py [50]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-6563fc9db12b41fab8c40e7392e78047264cc44e6ed59a95ab1eccbecb84d8adR50-R50) ```diff -test_gen.validate_test(generated_test, generated_tests) for generated_test in generated_tests['new_tests'] +test_gen.validate_test(generated_test, generated_tests) for generated_test in generated_tests.get('new_tests', []) ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a check for the existence and type of `generated_tests['new_tests']` before iterating is a good practice to avoid runtime errors. The suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue and provides a safer alternative.	7
Possible issue	Use `defaultdict` to handle missing keys more gracefully ___ To avoid potential issues with missing keys, consider using the `defaultdict` from the `collections` module instead of directly accessing the dictionary with `.get()`. This ensures that even if the key is missing, an empty list is returned. [cover_agent/main.py [155]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-610f77abc2025129e317ec1f98b3bb375b790b2197ed3f635331cca0a06fd999R155-R155) ```diff -for generated_test in generated_tests_dict.get('new_tests', []): +from collections import defaultdict +generated_tests_dict = defaultdict(list, generated_tests_dict) +for generated_test in generated_tests_dict['new_tests']: ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to use `defaultdict` for handling missing keys is valid and improves robustness. However, it's not a critical issue since the original code already handles missing keys with `.get()`.	6
Best practice	Define the `max_items` value to ensure proper validation ___ Ensure that the `max_items` value is correctly defined and not left as a placeholder. This will prevent potential issues during validation. [cover_agent/settings/test_generation_prompt.toml [72]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-760e793bfd5f739e4369c90b8347a1af81c1a2b57f9b7ce2487379fc18b0b926R72-R72) ```diff -new_tests: List[SingleTest] = Field(min_items=1, max_items={{ max_tests }}, description="A list of new test functions to append to the existing test suite, aiming to increase the code coverage. Each test should run as-is, without requiring any additional inputs or setup code. Don't introduce new dependencies") +new_tests: List[SingleTest] = Field(min_items=1, max_items=10, description="A list of new test functions to append to the existing test suite, aiming to increase the code coverage. Each test should run as-is, without requiring any additional inputs or setup code. Don't introduce new dependencies") ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: The suggestion to explicitly define `max_items` is a good practice to avoid issues during validation. However, the impact of this change is limited to clarity and correctness in configuration, not directly affecting the runtime behavior or performance of the code.	5
Maintainability	Define the `CANNED_TESTS` dictionary outside of the function for better maintainability ___ To improve readability and maintainability, consider defining the `CANNED_TESTS` dictionary outside of the function if it is used across multiple tests. This avoids redundancy and makes it easier to update the tests in one place. [tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py [16-19]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-6563fc9db12b41fab8c40e7392e78047264cc44e6ed59a95ab1eccbecb84d8adR16-R19) ```diff CANNED_TESTS = {'new_tests':[ {'test_code': 'def test_current_date():\n response = client.get("/current-date")\n assert response.status_code == 200\n assert "date" in response.json()'}, {'test_code':'def test_add():\n response = client.get("/add/2/3")\n assert response.status_code == 200\n assert "result" in response.json()\n assert response.json()["result"] == 5'}, ]} +def test_end_to_end1(self): + MAX_TOKENS = 4096 + DRY_RUN = True # Unit tests should not be making calls to the LLM model + ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: While the suggestion to define `CANNED_TESTS` outside of the function could improve maintainability, the provided `improved_code` does not reflect this change and simply repeats the existing code.	4

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 1 month ago

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

**Action:** test

**Failed stage:** [Run tests and generate reports](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/actions/runs/9280756710/job/25535539758) [❌]

**Failed test name:** tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_try_fix_yaml_llama3_8b

**Failure summary:** The action failed because the test tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_try_fix_yaml_llama3_8b failed.

The test failed due to an AssertionError.

The expected output did not match the actual output after attempting to fix the YAML formatting.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 790: configfile: pyproject.toml 791: plugins: mock-3.14.0, cov-5.0.0, anyio-3.7.1 792: collected 38 items 793: templated_tests/python_fastapi/test_app.py::test_root 794: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 795: INFO httpx:_client.py:1026 HTTP Request: GET http://testserver/ "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" 796: PASSED [ 2%] 797: tests/test_AICaller.py::TestAICaller::test_call_model_simplified PASSED [ 5%] 798: tests/test_AICaller.py::TestAICaller::test_call_model_with_error PASSED [ 7%] 799: tests/test_AICaller.py::TestAICaller::test_call_model_error_streaming PASSED [ 10%] 800: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_parse_coverage_report_cobertura PASSED [ 13%] 801: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_c_file PASSED [ 15%] 802: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_py_file_with_function_only PASSED [ 18%] 803: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_py_file_with_commented_class PASSED [ 21%] 804: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_py_file_with_class PASSED [ 23%] 805: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_initialization_reads_file_contents PASSED [ 26%] 806: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_initialization_handles_file_read_errors PASSED [ 28%] 807: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_empty_included_files_section_not_in_prompt PASSED [ 31%] 808: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_non_empty_included_files_section_in_prompt PASSED [ 34%] 809: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_empty_additional_instructions_section_not_in_prompt PASSED [ 36%] 810: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_empty_failed_test_runs_section_not_in_prompt PASSED [ 39%] 811: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_non_empty_additional_instructions_section_in_prompt PASSED [ 42%] 812: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_non_empty_failed_test_runs_section_in_prompt PASSED [ 44%] 813: tests/test_ReportGenerator.py::TestReportGeneration::test_generate_report PASSED [ 47%] 814: tests/test_Runner.py::TestRunner::test_run_command_success PASSED [ 50%] 815: tests/test_Runner.py::TestRunner::test_run_command_with_cwd PASSED [ 52%] 816: tests/test_Runner.py::TestRunner::test_run_command_failure PASSED [ 55%] ... 825: tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py::TestUnitTestGenerator::test_end_to_end2 826: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 827: INFO cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:122 Running build/test command to generate coverage report: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml" 828: INFO cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:351 Running test with the following command: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml" 829: INFO cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:400 Test did not increase coverage. Rolling back. 830: INFO cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:351 Running test with the following command: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml" 831: INFO cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:400 Test did not increase coverage. Rolling back. 832: PASSED [ 60%] 833: tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py::TestExtractErrorMessage::test_extract_single_match PASSED [ 63%] 834: tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py::TestExtractErrorMessage::test_extract_bad_match 835: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 836: ERROR root:UnitTestGenerator.py:472 Error extracting error message: expected string or bytes-like object, got 'int' 837: PASSED [ 65%] 838: tests/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_valid_yaml PASSED [ 68%] 839: tests/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_invalid_yaml1 840: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 841: INFO root:utils.py:29 Failed to parse AI prediction: mapping values are not allowed here 842: in "", line 12, column 37: 843: relevant line: user="""PR Info: aaa 844: ^. Attempting to fix YAML formatting. 845: INFO root:utils.py:73 Successfully parsed AI prediction after adding |- 846: PASSED [ 71%] 847: tests/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_invalid_yaml2 848: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 849: INFO root:utils.py:29 Failed to parse AI prediction: mapping values are not allowed here ... 858: PASSED [ 76%] 859: tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_try_fix_yaml_remove_all_lines 860: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 861: INFO root:utils.py:110 Successfully parsed AI prediction after removing 1 lines 862: PASSED [ 78%] 863: tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_try_fix_yaml_llama3_8b 864: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 865: INFO root:utils.py:110 Successfully parsed AI prediction after removing 2 lines 866: FAILED [ 81%] 867: tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_invalid_yaml_wont_parse 868: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 869: INFO root:utils.py:29 Failed to parse AI prediction: mapping values are not allowed here 870: in "", line 3, column 9: 871: language: python 872: ^. Attempting to fix YAML formatting. 873: INFO root:utils.py:32 Failed to parse AI prediction after fixing YAML formatting. 874: PASSED [ 84%] 875: tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_parse_args PASSED [ 86%] 876: tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_main_source_file_not_found PASSED [ 89%] 877: tests/test_main.py::TestMain::test_main_test_file_not_found PASSED [ 92%] 878: tests/test_version.py::TestGetVersion::test_get_version_happy_path PASSED [ 94%] 879: tests/test_version.py::TestGetVersion::test_get_version_file_missing PASSED [ 97%] 880: tests/test_version.py::TestGetVersion::test_get_version_empty_or_whitespace_file PASSED [100%] 881: =================================== FAILURES =================================== ... 891: test_name: test_current_date 892: test_code: | 893: bbb 894: test_tags: happy path 895: hope this helps! 896: """ 897: expected_output = {'here is the response': None, 'language': 'python', 'new_tests': [{'test_behavior': 'aaa\n', 'test_name': 'test_current_date', 'test_code': 'bbb\n', 'test_tags': 'happy path'}]} 898: > assert try_fix_yaml(yaml_str) == expected_output 899: E AssertionError: assert {'here is the...happy path'}]} == {'here is the...happy path'}]} ... 920: E { 921: E 'test_behavior': 'aaa\n', 922: E 'test_code': 'bbb\n', 923: E 'test_name': 'test_current_date', 924: E 'test_tags': 'happy path', 925: E }, 926: E ], 927: E } 928: tests/test_load_yaml.py:127: AssertionError 929: ------------------------------ Captured log call ------------------------------- 930: INFO root:utils.py:110 Successfully parsed AI prediction after removing 2 lines 931: =============================== warnings summary =============================== 932: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:680 933: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:680: DeprecationWarning: The 'app' shortcut is now deprecated. Use the explicit style 'transport=WSGITransport(app=...)' instead. 934: warnings.warn(message, DeprecationWarning) 935: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:284: 25 warnings 936: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:284: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Support for class-based `config` is deprecated, use ConfigDict instead. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 937: warnings.warn(DEPRECATION_MESSAGE, DeprecationWarning) 938: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:260 939: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:260: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 940: @root_validator(pre=True) 941: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:347 942: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:347: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: `pydantic.config.Extra` is deprecated, use literal values instead (e.g. `extra='allow'`). Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 943: extra = Extra.allow # Allow extra fields 944: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:350 945: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:350: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 946: @root_validator(pre=True) 947: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:379 948: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:379: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 949: @root_validator(pre=True) 950: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:426 951: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:426: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 952: @root_validator(pre=True) 953: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:495 954: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:495: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 955: @root_validator(pre=True) 956: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:515 957: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:515: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 958: @root_validator(pre=True) 959: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:528 960: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:528: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 961: @root_validator(pre=True) 962: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:573 963: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:573: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 964: @root_validator(pre=True) 965: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:610 966: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:610: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 967: @root_validator(pre=True) 968: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:928 969: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:928: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 970: @root_validator(pre=True) 971: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:955 972: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:955: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 973: @root_validator(pre=True) 974: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:976 975: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:976: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 995: cover_agent/settings/config_loader.py 20 1 95% 996: cover_agent/utils.py 71 9 87% 997: cover_agent/version.py 11 1 91% 998: ----------------------------------------------------------- 999: TOTAL 559 162 71% 1000: Coverage XML written to file cobertura.xml 1001: Required test coverage of 70% reached. Total coverage: 71.02% 1002: =========================== short test summary info ============================ 1003: FAILED tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_try_fix_yaml_llama3_8b - AssertionError: assert {'here is the...happy path'}]} == {'here is the...happy path'}]} ... 1022: { 1023: 'test_behavior': 'aaa\n', 1024: 'test_code': 'bbb\n', 1025: 'test_name': 'test_current_date', 1026: 'test_tags': 'happy path', 1027: }, 1028: ], 1029: } 1030: ================== 1 failed, 37 passed, 40 warnings in 18.29s ================== 1031: make: *** [Makefile:6: test] Error 1 1032: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2. ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

mrT23 commented 3 weeks ago

/improve

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add a check to handle cases where the dictionary might be `None` ___ To handle potential cases where `generated_tests_dict` is `None`, add a check before iterating over `generated_tests_dict.get('new_tests', [])`. [cover_agent/main.py [155]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-610f77abc2025129e317ec1f98b3bb375b790b2197ed3f635331cca0a06fd999R155-R155) ```diff -for generated_test in generated_tests_dict.get('new_tests', []): +if generated_tests_dict: + for generated_test in generated_tests_dict.get('new_tests', []): ``` - [ ] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue where `generated_tests_dict` could be `None`, which would cause an error during iteration. This is a valid improvement for robustness.	7
Best practice	Add a check to verify that the result contains the expected keys ___ To ensure consistency, add a check to verify that `try_fix_yaml` returns a dictionary with the expected keys. [tests/test_load_yaml.py [127]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-8c768f74c0ec315cae609328dee7f760186071e8e9f0bbd6338b1b49ad0749beR127-R127) ```diff -assert try_fix_yaml(yaml_str) == expected_output +result = try_fix_yaml(yaml_str) +assert 'new_tests' in result +assert result == expected_output ``` - [ ] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a check to ensure the presence of expected keys in the result of `try_fix_yaml` increases the robustness and reliability of the test, ensuring that the function behaves as expected.	6
Enhancement	Use a variable to store the list of new tests for better readability ___ To improve readability, consider using a variable to store `generated_tests['new_tests']` before the list comprehension. [tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py [50]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-6563fc9db12b41fab8c40e7392e78047264cc44e6ed59a95ab1eccbecb84d8adR50-R50) ```diff -test_gen.validate_test(generated_test, generated_tests) for generated_test in generated_tests['new_tests'] +new_tests = generated_tests['new_tests'] +test_gen.validate_test(generated_test, generated_tests) for generated_test in new_tests ``` - [ ] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: The suggestion improves readability by storing the list in a variable before using it in a list comprehension. This is a minor enhancement that makes the code cleaner and easier to understand.	5
Clarity	Update the description to specify that the list should contain instances of `SingleTest` ___ To improve clarity, update the description of `new_tests` to specify that the list should contain instances of `SingleTest`. [cover_agent/settings/test_generation_prompt.toml [72]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/63/files#diff-760e793bfd5f739e4369c90b8347a1af81c1a2b57f9b7ce2487379fc18b0b926R72-R72) ```diff -new_tests: List[SingleTest] = Field(min_items=1, max_items={{ max_tests }}, description="A list of new test functions to append to the existing test suite, aiming to increase the code coverage. Each test should run as-is, without requiring any additional inputs or setup code. Don't introduce new dependencies") +new_tests: List[SingleTest] = Field(min_items=1, max_items={{ max_tests }}, description="A list of `SingleTest` instances to append to the existing test suite, aiming to increase the code coverage. Each test should run as-is, without requiring any additional inputs or setup code. Don't introduce new dependencies") ``` - [ ] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: The suggestion to clarify the description in the TOML configuration is minor but helps improve the documentation's clarity by specifying the type of objects in the list. However, the existing description already implies this, making the suggestion less impactful.	4

Codium-ai / cover-agent

Tr/prompts2 #63

PR Type

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

PR Review 🔍

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

PR Code Suggestions ✨