Tr/insert line - Githubissues

mrT23 commented 3 weeks ago

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation

Description

Enhanced the logic for inserting new tests and imports by renaming variables for clarity and adding handling for inserting imports at a specific line.
Updated the test cases to reflect the changes in variable names.
Updated configuration files to match new variable names and added a new field for import insertion.
Clarified the description for the new_imports_code field in the test generation prompt.
Added an instruction to update the PATH for Go binaries in the Go webservice README.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

UnitTestGenerator.py

Enhance test insertion logic and variable naming

cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py

Renamed variables for clarity (relevant_line_number_to_insert_after to
relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after and
relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after).

Added handling for inserting imports at a specific line.

Improved handling of additional imports in validate_test method.

+35/-23

analyze_suite_test_insert_line.toml

Update configuration for test and import insertion

cover_agent/settings/analyze_suite_test_insert_line.toml

Updated field names to match new variable names.

Added new field for inserting imports.

+9/-2

Tests

test_UnitTestGenerator.py

Update tests for new variable names

tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py - Updated tests to reflect changes in variable names.

+2/-2

Documentation

test_generation_prompt.toml `Clarify new imports code description` cover_agent/settings/test_generation_prompt.toml - Clarified description for `new_imports_code` field.	+1/-1
README.md `Update Go coverage instructions` templated_tests/go_webservice/README.md - Added instruction to update PATH for Go binaries.	+1/-0

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	3, because the PR involves multiple changes across different files including Python scripts and configuration files. The changes are not only about renaming variables but also include logic modifications and handling of new cases which require careful review to ensure that the new logic correctly integrates with the existing codebase.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The increment of `relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after` after inserting imports might not account for multiple test insertions in a single run. If multiple tests are inserted in one execution, the line number might not update correctly for subsequent tests, leading to incorrect insertions.
🔒 Security concerns	No

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/commit/cb76e839f466bf46967cb073eed8630579c82071)

**Action:** test

**Failed stage:** [Run tests and generate reports](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/actions/runs/9362720251/job/25772008042) [❌]

**Failure summary:** The action failed because the required test coverage threshold was not met. Specific details
include:

The total test coverage achieved was 69.03%, which is below the required 70%.

The failure occurred after all tests passed, indicating that the issue is solely with the coverage
percentage.

The process completed with exit code 2 due to the coverage shortfall.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 803: plugins: mock-3.14.0, asyncio-0.23.7, cov-5.0.0, anyio-3.7.1 804: asyncio: mode=Mode.STRICT 805: collected 52 items 806: templated_tests/python_fastapi/test_app.py::test_root 807: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 808: INFO httpx:_client.py:1026 HTTP Request: GET http://testserver/ "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" 809: PASSED [ 1%] 810: tests/test_AICaller.py::TestAICaller::test_call_model_simplified PASSED [ 3%] 811: tests/test_AICaller.py::TestAICaller::test_call_model_with_error PASSED [ 5%] 812: tests/test_AICaller.py::TestAICaller::test_call_model_error_streaming PASSED [ 7%] ... 816: tests/test_CoverAgent.py::TestCoverAgent::test_parse_args PASSED [ 15%] 817: tests/test_CoverAgent.py::TestCoverAgent::test_agent_source_file_not_found PASSED [ 17%] 818: tests/test_CoverAgent.py::TestCoverAgent::test_agent_test_file_not_found PASSED [ 19%] 819: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_parse_coverage_report_cobertura PASSED [ 21%] 820: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_correct_parsing_for_matching_package_and_class PASSED [ 23%] 821: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_returns_empty_lists_and_float PASSED [ 25%] 822: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_parse_coverage_report_unsupported_type PASSED [ 26%] 823: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_parse_coverage_report_not_implemented PASSED [ 28%] 824: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_extract_package_and_class_java_file_error 825: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 826: ERROR cover_agent.CoverageProcessor:CoverageProcessor.py:184 Error reading file path/to/MyClass.java: File not found 827: PASSED [ 30%] 828: tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py::TestCoverageProcessor::test_extract_package_and_class_java PASSED [ 32%] 829: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_c_file PASSED [ 34%] 830: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_py_file_with_function_only PASSED [ 36%] 831: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_py_file_with_commented_class PASSED [ 38%] 832: tests/test_FilePreprocessor.py::TestFilePreprocessor::test_py_file_with_class PASSED [ 40%] 833: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_initialization_reads_file_contents PASSED [ 42%] 834: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_initialization_handles_file_read_errors PASSED [ 44%] 835: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_empty_included_files_section_not_in_prompt PASSED [ 46%] 836: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_non_empty_included_files_section_in_prompt PASSED [ 48%] 837: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_empty_additional_instructions_section_not_in_prompt PASSED [ 50%] 838: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_empty_failed_test_runs_section_not_in_prompt PASSED [ 51%] 839: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_non_empty_additional_instructions_section_in_prompt PASSED [ 53%] 840: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_non_empty_failed_test_runs_section_in_prompt PASSED [ 55%] 841: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_build_prompt_custom_handles_rendering_exception 842: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 843: ERROR root:PromptBuilder.py:180 Error rendering prompt: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'system' 844: PASSED [ 57%] 845: tests/test_PromptBuilder.py::TestPromptBuilder::test_build_prompt_handles_rendering_exception 846: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 847: ERROR root:PromptBuilder.py:150 Error rendering prompt: Rendering error 848: PASSED [ 59%] 849: tests/test_ReportGenerator.py::TestReportGeneration::test_generate_report PASSED [ 61%] 850: tests/test_Runner.py::TestRunner::test_run_command_success PASSED [ 63%] 851: tests/test_Runner.py::TestRunner::test_run_command_with_cwd PASSED [ 65%] 852: tests/test_Runner.py::TestRunner::test_run_command_failure PASSED [ 67%] 853: tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py::TestUnitTestGenerator::test_end_to_end1 854: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 855: INFO cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:124 Running build/test command to generate coverage report: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml" 856: ERROR cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:512 Error validating test: 'UnitTestGenerator' object has no attribute 'relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after' 857: ERROR cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:512 Error validating test: 'UnitTestGenerator' object has no attribute 'relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after' 858: PASSED [ 69%] 859: tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py::TestUnitTestGenerator::test_end_to_end2 860: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 861: INFO cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:124 Running build/test command to generate coverage report: "pytest --cov=. --cov-report=xml" 862: ERROR cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:512 Error validating test: 'UnitTestGenerator' object has no attribute 'relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after' 863: ERROR cover_agent.UnitTestGenerator:UnitTestGenerator.py:512 Error validating test: 'UnitTestGenerator' object has no attribute 'relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after' 864: PASSED [ 71%] 865: tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py::TestExtractErrorMessage::test_extract_single_match PASSED [ 73%] 866: tests/test_UnitTestGenerator.py::TestExtractErrorMessage::test_extract_bad_match 867: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 868: ERROR root:UnitTestGenerator.py:538 Error extracting error message: expected string or bytes-like object, got 'int' 869: PASSED [ 75%] 870: tests/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_valid_yaml PASSED [ 76%] 871: tests/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_invalid_yaml1 872: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 873: INFO root:utils.py:29 Failed to parse AI prediction: mapping values are not allowed here 874: in "", line 12, column 37: 875: relevant line: user="""PR Info: aaa 876: ^. Attempting to fix YAML formatting. 877: INFO root:utils.py:75 Successfully parsed AI prediction after adding |- 878: PASSED [ 78%] 879: tests/test_load_yaml.py::TestLoadYaml::test_load_invalid_yaml2 880: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 881: INFO root:utils.py:29 Failed to parse AI prediction: mapping values are not allowed here ... 893: INFO root:utils.py:112 Successfully parsed AI prediction after removing 1 lines 894: PASSED [ 84%] 895: tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_try_fix_yaml_llama3_8b 896: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 897: INFO root:utils.py:112 Successfully parsed AI prediction after removing 2 lines 898: PASSED [ 86%] 899: tests/test_load_yaml.py::test_invalid_yaml_wont_parse 900: -------------------------------- live log call --------------------------------- 901: INFO root:utils.py:29 Failed to parse AI prediction: mapping values are not allowed here 902: in "", line 3, column 9: 903: language: python 904: ^. Attempting to fix YAML formatting. 905: INFO root:utils.py:34 Failed to parse AI prediction after fixing YAML formatting. ... 910: tests/test_version.py::TestGetVersion::test_get_version_happy_path PASSED [ 96%] 911: tests/test_version.py::TestGetVersion::test_get_version_file_missing PASSED [ 98%] 912: tests/test_version.py::TestGetVersion::test_get_version_empty_or_whitespace_file PASSED [100%] 913: =============================== warnings summary =============================== 914: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:680 915: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/httpx/_client.py:680: DeprecationWarning: The 'app' shortcut is now deprecated. Use the explicit style 'transport=WSGITransport(app=...)' instead. 916: warnings.warn(message, DeprecationWarning) 917: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:284: 25 warnings 918: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_config.py:284: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Support for class-based `config` is deprecated, use ConfigDict instead. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 919: warnings.warn(DEPRECATION_MESSAGE, DeprecationWarning) 920: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:260 921: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:260: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 922: @root_validator(pre=True) 923: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:347 924: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:347: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: `pydantic.config.Extra` is deprecated, use literal values instead (e.g. `extra='allow'`). Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 925: extra = Extra.allow # Allow extra fields 926: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:350 927: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:350: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 928: @root_validator(pre=True) 929: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:379 930: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:379: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 931: @root_validator(pre=True) 932: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:426 933: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:426: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 934: @root_validator(pre=True) 935: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:495 936: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:495: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 937: @root_validator(pre=True) 938: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:515 939: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:515: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 940: @root_validator(pre=True) 941: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:528 942: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:528: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 943: @root_validator(pre=True) 944: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:573 945: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:573: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 946: @root_validator(pre=True) 947: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:610 948: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:610: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 949: @root_validator(pre=True) 950: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:928 951: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:928: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 952: @root_validator(pre=True) 953: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:955 954: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:955: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 955: @root_validator(pre=True) 956: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:976 957: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/cover-agent-a0pACUfe-py3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/litellm/proxy/_types.py:976: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@root_validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@model_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 982: cover_agent/settings/config_loader.py 20 1 95% 983: cover_agent/utils.py 71 9 87% 984: cover_agent/version.py 11 1 91% 985: ----------------------------------------------------------- 986: TOTAL 649 201 69% 987: Coverage XML written to file cobertura.xml 988: FAIL Required test coverage of 70% not reached. Total coverage: 69.03% 989: ======================= 52 passed, 42 warnings in 12.91s ======================= 990: make: *** [Makefile:8: test] Error 1 991: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2. ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

mrT23 commented 3 weeks ago

@ProferoAntonKZ @davidparry

You are welcome to test this PR, which tries to methodically tackle https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/issues/74

It is not trivial to properly insert imports for any code language in the world, and might require 'additional instructions' from the user. But I think this new framework is at least diverse enough to handle this. It worked on the '.go' example, see the picture in the header

mrT23 commented 3 weeks ago

/improve

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	✅ Add a condition to break the loop if the maximum number of attempts is reached ___ Suggestion Impact: The suggestion was implemented by adding a condition to the while loop to check if counter_attempts is less than allowed_attempts, preventing an infinite loop. code diff: ```diff - while not relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after: + while not relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after and counter_attempts < allowed_attempts: prompt_test_insert_line = ( self.prompt_builder.build_prompt_custom( file="analyze_suite_test_insert_line" @@ -283,8 +283,7 @@ "relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after", None ) counter_attempts += 1 - if counter_attempts >= allowed_attempts: - break ``` ___ The `while` loop at line 269 should include a condition to break out if the `counter_attempts` exceeds `allowed_attempts`, similar to the previous loop at line 247. This prevents an infinite loop if the condition is never met. [cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py [269-285]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/82/files#diff-19760582d9ede3a799fdbb541ad357b4822682e837bca8365196fba50daf57e3R269-R285) ```diff -while not relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after: +while not relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after and counter_attempts < allowed_attempts: prompt_test_insert_line = ( self.prompt_builder.build_prompt_custom( file="analyze_suite_test_insert_line" ) ) response, prompt_token_count, response_token_count = ( self.ai_caller.call_model(prompt=prompt_test_insert_line) ) tests_dict = load_yaml(response) relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after = tests_dict.get( "relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after", None ) relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after = tests_dict.get( "relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after", None ) counter_attempts += 1 - if counter_attempts >= allowed_attempts: - break ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential infinite loop scenario and provides a crucial fix to prevent it, enhancing the robustness of the code.	10
Possible bug	✅ Add a check to ensure additional_imports is not empty before accessing its characters ___ Suggestion Impact: The suggestion was implemented by adding a check to ensure additional_imports is not empty before accessing its first and last characters. code diff: ```diff - if additional_imports[0]=='"' and additional_imports[-1]=='"': ``` ___ The `if` condition at line 341 should check if `additional_imports` is not empty before accessing its first and last characters to avoid potential `IndexError`. [cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py [341-342]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/82/files#diff-19760582d9ede3a799fdbb541ad357b4822682e837bca8365196fba50daf57e3R341-R342) ```diff -if additional_imports[0]=='"' and additional_imports[-1]=='"': +if additional_imports and additional_imports[0]=='"' and additional_imports[-1]=='"': additional_imports = additional_imports.strip('"') ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses a possible IndexError by ensuring that the string is not empty before accessing its characters, which is a significant error prevention.	9
Best practice	Raise the original exception to preserve the stack trace ___ The `raise` statement at line 298 should raise the original exception `e` to preserve the stack trace and provide more context for debugging. [cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py [298]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/82/files#diff-19760582d9ede3a799fdbb541ad357b4822682e837bca8365196fba50daf57e3R298-R298) ```diff -raise Exception("Error during initial test suite analysis") +raise Exception("Error during initial test suite analysis") from e ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Raising the original exception using `from e` is a best practice that provides more context for debugging, making this suggestion valuable for error handling.	8
Maintainability	Ensure `additional_imports` is not already in `processed_test_lines` before inserting to avoid redundancy ___ The `if` condition at line 377 should check if `additional_imports` is not already in `processed_test_lines` before splitting and inserting it to avoid redundant imports. [cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py [377-384]](https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/pull/82/files#diff-19760582d9ede3a799fdbb541ad357b4822682e837bca8365196fba50daf57e3R377-R384) ```diff -if relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after and additional_imports and additional_imports not in processed_test: +if relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after and additional_imports and additional_imports not in "\n".join(processed_test_lines): additional_imports_lines = additional_imports.split("\n") processed_test_lines = ( processed_test_lines[:relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after] + additional_imports_lines + processed_test_lines[relevant_line_number_to_insert_imports_after:] ) self.relevant_line_number_to_insert_tests_after += len(additional_imports_lines) ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion improves maintainability by preventing redundant imports, although it checks against the whole `processed_test` instead of `processed_test_lines`. The intent is correct, but the implementation detail in the suggestion is slightly off.	7

davidparry commented 3 weeks ago

@ProferoAntonKZ @davidparry

You are welcome to test this PR, which tries to methodically tackle https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/issues/74

It is not trivial to properly insert imports for any code language in the world, and might require 'additional instructions' from the user. But I think this new framework is at least diverse enough to handle this. It worked on the '.go' example, see the picture in the header

Thank you for the effort, I will try to test it when I get some free time.

davidparry commented 3 weeks ago

@ProferoAntonKZ @davidparry You are welcome to test this PR, which tries to methodically tackle #74 It is not trivial to properly insert imports for any code language in the world, and might require 'additional instructions' from the user. But I think this new framework is at least diverse enough to handle this. It worked on the '.go' example, see the picture in the header

Thank you for the effort, I will try to test it when I get some free time.

This PR is to much behind the main that none of the java/jacoco is present, i would not be able to validate that it works with jacoco

mrT23 commented 3 weeks ago

@ProferoAntonKZ @davidparry You are welcome to test this PR, which tries to methodically tackle #74 It is not trivial to properly insert imports for any code language in the world, and might require 'additional instructions' from the user. But I think this new framework is at least diverse enough to handle this. It worked on the '.go' example, see the picture in the header

Thank you for the effort, I will try to test it when I get some free time.

This PR is to much behind the main that none of the java/jacoco is present, i would not be able to validate that it works with jacoco

which files ? This PR is fully merged from main.

davidparry commented 3 weeks ago

@ProferoAntonKZ @davidparry You are welcome to test this PR, which tries to methodically tackle #74 It is not trivial to properly insert imports for any code language in the world, and might require 'additional instructions' from the user. But I think this new framework is at least diverse enough to handle this. It worked on the '.go' example, see the picture in the header

Thank you for the effort, I will try to test it when I get some free time.

This PR is to much behind the main that none of the java/jacoco is present, i would not be able to validate that it works with jacoco

which files ? This PR is fully merged from main. Nevermind. I now am looking at the branch and see the java_gradle resources was added, github even reported it was many revisions back but now it is up to date.

davidparry commented 3 weeks ago

@ProferoAntonKZ @davidparry

You are welcome to test this PR, which tries to methodically tackle #74

It is not trivial to properly insert imports for any code language in the world, and might require 'additional instructions' from the user. But I think this new framework is at least diverse enough to handle this. It worked on the '.go' example, see the picture in the header

It works on the java_gradle project too.