Closed mdbergmann closed 3 years ago
I was exploring lazy sequences. The usual choice, Series, is good, but the API is very different compared to Clojure, Haskell or other functional languages. There are a few wrappers, like folio2. But Folio2 generates more confusion with the mixup of FSet and Series. Anyway, the author did write a comment in Reddit that I fortunately could recall. https://www.reddit.com/r/Common_Lisp/comments/hr3ibu/taps_a_small_number_of_functions_that_make_series/
This library has a good documentation and test code (not enough, but maybe sufficient).
Having sais all this I just realized that this project is not in quicklisp. Should it be? And you suggest to first bring it up in Reddit or so?
Being in Quicklisp is not a prerequisite for inclusion here.
Indeed I suggest a post on reddit.
I was exploring lazy sequences. The usual choice, Series, is good, but the API is very different compared to Clojure, Haskell or other functional languages. There are a few wrappers, like folio2. But Folio2 generates more confusion with the mixup of FSet and Series.
absolutely. This (weirdly named) library seems very welcome, filling a gap.
Good find! You advertise it on social networks first to see if something useful comes out?