Repository to research & share articles related to autonomous driving cars.
77
stars
9
forks
source link
Reachability Verification Based Reliability Assessment for Deep Reinforcement Learning Controlled Robotics and Autonomous Systems. (arXiv:2210.14991v2 [cs.RO] UPDATED) #29542
Reachability Verification Based Reliability Assessment for Deep Reinforcement Learning Controlled Robotics and Autonomous Systems. (arXiv:2210.14991v2 [cs.RO] UPDATED) https://ift.tt/pBvM7ce
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved impressive performance in
robotics and autonomous systems (RAS). A key challenge to its deployment in
real-life operations is the presence of spuriously unsafe DRL policies.
Unexplored states may lead the agent to make wrong decisions that could result
in hazards, especially in applications where DRL-trained end-to-end controllers
govern the behaviour of RAS. This paper proposes a novel quantitative
reliability assessment framework for DRL-controlled RAS, leveraging
verification evidence generated from formal reliability analysis of neural
networks. A two-level verification framework is introduced to check the safety
property with respect to inaccurate observations that are due to, e.g.,
environmental noise and state changes. Reachability verification tools are
leveraged locally to generate safety evidence of trajectories. In contrast, at
the global level, we quantify the overall reliability as an aggregated metric
of local safety evidence, corresponding to a set of distinct tasks and their
occurrence probabilities. The effectiveness of the proposed verification
framework is demonstrated and validated via experiments on real RAS.
Reachability Verification Based Reliability Assessment for Deep Reinforcement Learning Controlled Robotics and Autonomous Systems. (arXiv:2210.14991v2 [cs.RO] UPDATED)
https://ift.tt/pBvM7ce
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved impressive performance in robotics and autonomous systems (RAS). A key challenge to its deployment in real-life operations is the presence of spuriously unsafe DRL policies. Unexplored states may lead the agent to make wrong decisions that could result in hazards, especially in applications where DRL-trained end-to-end controllers govern the behaviour of RAS. This paper proposes a novel quantitative reliability assessment framework for DRL-controlled RAS, leveraging verification evidence generated from formal reliability analysis of neural networks. A two-level verification framework is introduced to check the safety property with respect to inaccurate observations that are due to, e.g., environmental noise and state changes. Reachability verification tools are leveraged locally to generate safety evidence of trajectories. In contrast, at the global level, we quantify the overall reliability as an aggregated metric of local safety evidence, corresponding to a set of distinct tasks and their occurrence probabilities. The effectiveness of the proposed verification framework is demonstrated and validated via experiments on real RAS.
via cs.RO updates on arXiv.org http://arxiv.org/