Open danyaljj opened 8 years ago
Any reason not to stay with lbjava’s terminology as much as possible?
Dan
From: Daniel Khashabi [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 6:15 PM To: IllinoisCogComp/saul Subject: [IllinoisCogComp/saul] Name inconsistency (#271)
We need to decide on these namings to bring more consistency to our code:
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_IllinoisCogComp_saul_issues_271&d=CwMCaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=EoEIPOcXriNKNTRQxPa5uv7hPypxUE6tE_RlGOluh-c&m=AG83foV3dsnjimqMMQaZGMBYsipV2DVKOA_iwUBTuPo&s=tB38LIGgvI-tNoM6T19Y5F4yF4wyi4welh_anFShQrM&e=
I think we can improve it, though sometimes they have different functionalities like Learner and Classifier in LBJava and just to make it more clear different names are used here as well.
Name change suggestions:
We need to decide on these namings to bring more consistency to our code: