Open danyaljj opened 8 years ago
Minor comment. Also this PR would conflict with the other PR on ClassifierUtils. LGTM! Assigning to parisa for any comments.
@kordjamshidi could you comment on this?
it is hard to compare since they are big chucks of moving codes, but the integration of the two is ok, if 1) you have not changed the body of jointTraining loop 2) you have tested the ER results with this change. then it is ok for me to merge.
One minor note: going to the case
and checking the type of classifier in each iteration seems redundant though I see this happens because of the recursion style of the loop.
This is different than the results in the readme?
Are the results ok for this change? should I merge this?
I want to take a closer look into results. Will do it over the weekend.
@danyaljj You might have to do this work afresh. There have been some changes in this and related files over the last few months.
I'll wait for #380 and then send a fresh copy.
fyi @kordjamshidi