Closed mdb closed 8 years ago
@ChrisHines Thanks! Apologies for overlooking that; I've made another commit per your continued feedback.
You may ignore my advise about the method names if you think the current names are more familiar to your users for reasons specific to the domain. But I think the advise for restructuring the comments is still sound.
@ChrisHines Thanks - Your method naming suggestion is valid and worthy of consideration, though I think it may be beyond the scope of what this PR seeks to address. Do you disagree?
@mdb Sure. The method naming style isn't checked by go vet or golint. If you like my suggestion a separate PR make sense, otherwise ignore it.
This addresses issue #2, as well as addresses
go vet
concerns.